Sunday, December 31, 2006

Aboulafia for December

Dear Fellow Avio-Bibliophiles,

I haven’t written a book review since fourth grade (I think the last one I reviewed involved space aliens). It’s time I returned to this lost prose form; John Newhouse’s Boeing Versus Airbus (Knopf, 2007) is about to arrive. It’s got no monsters or rockets, but it’s the best thing you’ll read in 2007.

First some background. Newhouse wrote the most important book yet produced about the jetliner industry. The Sporty Game (Knopf, 1982), written when Newhouse was at The New Yorker, was the first book to intelligently explain the business of building jets to a broad readership. As a young and callow defense industry analyst, I read it in the late 1980s and quickly realized Newhouse was on to something: the jetliner industry is more dynamic and fast changing than the defense side of aerospace. Thus began my parallel career as a jetliner industry analyst.

For years, well-read folks wondered who will be the next John Newhouse. Turns out Newhouse is the new Newhouse. His return visit to the industry has resulted in the sequel with its rather anodyne title (I would prefer The Sporty Game Part Deux, or something snappy like The Game That Has Not Gotten Any Less Sporty Over The Past 25 Years). It was timed to arrive with the A380. Unlike the A380, it’s arriving on time. (Like the A380, technical problems will limit production to 13 books in 2008 and 25 in 2009. Kidding.)

Much has changed since 1982. Back then, the L-1011 was in production, Airbus was a long way from jumping the shark, I was in college, and Billy Idol was regarded as pretty cool. With the industry speeding along at its usual pace, timing this book sounds impossible. Yet it’s arriving at an opportune moment. The competition is at an inflection point. While Airbus faces very difficult years ahead and its recovery is far from assured, it’s finally on the right path. Its market share and revenue will take a few body blows in the coming years, but in terms of strategic direction, they’re rebounding after hitting rock bottom. The new leadership is resisting state control and is trying hard to reform government-influenced manufacturing decisions. It’s not happening at the speed 99-day CEO Christian Streiff wanted, but it beats winding up as a ward of the state. It’s a great time for an industry snapshot.

The new book adroitly assesses what brought Airbus to this point, and what can bring it back. The A380, naturally, gets a richly deserved chapter of its own. While the tone of The Very Large Airplane chapter could have been harsher, he makes it clear that the A380 is best regarded as a serious misstep. It’s a fine chapter that fully explores airline plans, airport expansion concerns, and large aircraft technology. While written before the Lufthansa 747-8 passenger launch order, the chapter presciently concludes that the reinvented Boeing jumbo is a serious threat to A380 demand.

I believe Airbus can recover from its A380-induced near-death crisis; the A350 (Version 6.0) seems a sound roadmap (although finding the resources will be difficult). But this recovery will be very different from Boeing’s return to leadership over the past two years (adeptly described by Newhouse in the new book’s Trading Places chapter). In 1997-2003 Boeing failed to invest, but they had plenty of money. All they needed in 2004 was a new idea and a board decision to turn the cash spigot back on. Airbus, by contrast, misinvested on a colossal level and is now in a deep fiscal hole.

Yet Newhouse reminds us that a few years ago Boeing could have gone either way. He got Harry Stonecipher to admit that he considered firing Alan Mulally (page 39 in my uncorrected proof copy). The guy who stifled new product development funding at two companies almost canned a key architect of BCA’s renaissance. This revelation makes Stonecipher even more of a Rumsfeldian character than Noel Forgeard (I was wrong—this book does have monsters).

Interestingly, Newhouse opines that Stonecipher deserves much credit for getting Boeing back in shape. And the book’s Meltdown and Merger chapter provides an excellent treatment of how McDonnell Douglas used Boeing’s money to buy Boeing, at the very moment Boeing’s jetliner production lines discombobulated. A long time political writer, Newhouse is at his best when writing about the role of government in this industry. The WTO complaint, the tanker imbroglio, and government technology development cash all get superb exploration in the well-titled Folly and Hypocrisy chapter. Those appalled by government interference in airline jet purchasing decisions will find much to loathe. These are sordid tales, but someone’s gotta tell ‘em, and Newhouse puts them in proper context.

What’s not to like? Just one or two quibbles. Newhouse gives a bit too much credence to folks who regard industrial cooperation with Asia as a way to create a new competitor. The book’s A Challenge From Asia chapter sounds a somewhat overcautious note about outsourcing. Yet consider these words: “For Boeing…the idea of a partnership with Japan is double-edged…Accepting it could involve helping Japan to learn all of the skills required to compete against Boeing on the next airplane.” Agree? Well, that’s from The Sporty Game (pages 218-219). In the quarter century since Newhouse wrote those words, Japan’s military aircraft industry has imploded, China has done almost nothing of note, and all of the other Asian aviation wannabes have either collapsed like IPTN or gradually scaled back their ambitions. Boeing has done a fine job co-opting Japanese ambitions and taking advantage of their funding. Airbus is trying to emulate Boeing, albeit in China, which offers less experience and money. In short, Asian countries will always be the next big aviation power. Also, retired Airbus forecaster Adam Brown gets fingered as the biggest “prophet” behind the A380 launch decision (page 157). As a market analyst, I’m reluctant to blame the market analyst, and blaming anyone in particular misses the broader point. Brown may have eagerly poured the Kool-Aid, but many people espouse bad ideas. The A380 was launched by an insular group of decision makers enabled by hubristic politicians and a corporate structure immune from the check and balances of equities and capital markets. It takes a village to burn a city, or something like that.

These minor disagreements aside, this book offers a remarkably balanced and superbly readable discussion of key industry issues. It offers the right blend of technology, politics, and economics and provides historic depth for the industry’s recent important events. Most of all, it reminds us that fascinating people populate and shape our industry. If you’re in the jetliner business, you need to read this book. If you aren’t in the business, reading this book will make you want to get into it. That’s what happened to me after reading The Sporty Game 20 years ago.

Yours, ‘Til The Movie Version Opens,
Richard Aboulafia

Saturday, December 30, 2006

Israir creates the world's smallest aviation niche market

Readers have been made aware of the fracas in Israel over the flights on the Sabbath by ElAL. Religious Jews were incensed and threatened to create their own airline and boycott ElAl. We poked some fun at that idea, but we have been trumped!

Israir is going to start flying a Torah! We kid you not. This gives new meaning to in-flight prayers being a "local call". Israir has thumbed its nose at ElAl and now is blantantly attracting Charedim (ultra-Orthodox). Who said competition wasn't a great thing?

Friday, December 29, 2006

Dummy of the year 2006

This one surely tops the bill as the dumbest travel story of the year - the story is great but the traveler, is well, dumb! The girlfriend needs to raise her sights, way higher. It also is worth thinking about the fact the traveler booked the trip online and, had he paid attention, would have seen the error right away. Oh well!
(Reuters) -- A 21-year-old German tourist who wanted to visit his girlfriend in the Australian metropolis Sydney landed 13,000 kilometers (8,077 miles) away near Sidney, Montana, after mistyping his destination on a flight booking Web site. Dressed for the Australian summer in T-shirt and shorts, Tobi Gutt left Germany on Saturday for a four-week holiday.

Instead of arriving "down under", Gutt found himself on a different continent and bound for the chilly state of Montana.

"I did wonder but I didn't want to say anything," Gutt told the Bild newspaper. "I thought to myself, you can fly to Australia via the United States."

Gutt's airline ticket routed him via the U.S. city of Portland, Oregon, to Billings, Montana. Only as he was about to board a commuter flight to Sidney -- an oil town of about 5,000 people -- did he realize his mistake.

The hapless tourist, who had only a thin jacket to keep out the winter cold, spent three days in Billings airport before he was able to buy a new ticket to Australia with 600 euros in cash that his parents and friends sent over from Germany.

"I didn't notice the mistake as my son is usually good with computers," his mother, Sabine, told Reuters.

Lufthansa RFP for in-flight Internet in January

Mid-January should see the publication of an RFP from Lufthansa to replace its Connexion service. The airline is keeping the current equipment in place and is trying to replace the service only. None of the current vendors that have been touting their ideas to the airline have been successful.

The airline currently has 66 planes that are Connexion-capable plus another three A340-600s to be delivered before the winter is over, for a total of 69 widebodies. This means Lufthansa has sufficient critical mass to make or break any vendor on its own. The vendor selection is planned for Spring and Lufthansa hopes to restart in-flight Internet by the end of 2007.

This means that Lufthansa is open to new ideas and is not tied into any vendor choice yet - otherwise why bother with the RFP? Indeed this information indicates the Wall Street Journal may have got it wrong. According to our interview, Lufthansa is in play and not tied with any vendor. In the story by Andy Pasztor (12/22/06) there is this quote - "A Lufthansa AG spokeswoman said the carrier is seeking a way to restart Boeing's Connexion in-flight Internet system toward the end of 2007. It leads a group that includes the Panasonic Avionics unit of Japan's Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.; Luxembourg satellite-operator SES Global SA; and Connexion subcontractor ViaSat Inc. of Carlsbad, Calif., the people familiar with the matter said." Our information is that Lufthansa is leading no such group at all. In our discussions with the airline we were told that whereas a year ago there were 20 vendors, the market has shrunk to two or three credible vendors (consortia) now. The market for global in-flight Internet access is simply too small for more than one provider at this stage.

Lufthansa will consider adding in-flight Internet to its single aisle fleet. The airline would even consider having separate vendors for the twin aisle (long haul) and single aisle (short haul) fleets. The airline prefers to keep the Connexion equipment installed rather than take planes out of service - the cost of flying the equipment does not appear to warrant removal. The solution to in-flight Internet is less hardware challenging than software challenging. Key hurdles to overcome are a global ISP, transfer of licenses and the ability to offer a global or near global footprint. Any vendor that can offer this will be able to plug into the Connexion equipment installed with software updates and perhaps new modems. The successful vendor will therefore be one which is able to combine know how from numerous sources to enable the service to restart.

Lufthansa can influence many airlines through its Star Alliance to follow its choice of vendor. This is why we think it is the airline to watch. Being the most committed to in-flight Internet, Lufthansa is also the most committed to a solution.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Panasonic feeling confident

Shephard Group -- "We are satisfied that the airline demand for true broadband is significantly greater than 500 aircraft, our threshold for a decision to launch,” says Panasonic strategic marketing director David Bruner. “But we need to get approvals from our partners and airlines, and it looks like it will be January before we can announce a go-ahead. After that we’ll name our service partners, suppliers and launch customers.”

Aiming to take up where Boeing Connexion left off, Panasonic is determined to avoid the miscalculations and misfortunes that beset that effective but expensive service.

At the beginning of the decade Boeing believed it had enough commitments from the US majors to make Connexion work as a business. 9/11 stopped the US majors and Connexion had to restart its marketing efforts. Several leading non-US airlines bought the concept and the service proved to be liked by business travellers who experienced it. ROI was slow and Boeing Company pulled the plug.

For Panasonic the key to success, along with a significantly cheaper and lighter technical solution, is a guaranteed critical mass of installations from Day 1 – hence the 500-aircraft target. “This is different from launching one of our inflight entertainment products,” comments Bruner. “Setting up a satellite network will call for a major investment and we can’t risk going ahead without a significant up-front customer commitment.”

The planned new offering is designed to be as attractive as possible to airlines that are already equipped for Connexion. “Our solution for them is to replace only the modem on the aircraft and leave all the rest of the hardware, including the antenna, in place,” says Bruner. “That will spare them the expense of reversing the Connexion installations and then putting in our definitive equipment suite.”

That includes a compact Ku-band antenna from Californian-based L-3 Datron Advanced Technologies. Another L-3 Communications operation, the Linkabit division, is supplying the modem. Both are already fully developed for US military applications and have been modified for civil use by removing the encryption provision. Working with an existing Ku-band satellite system, the hardware is capable of delivering 12Mbit/sec to the aircraft and 3Mbit/sec in the opposite direction, according to Bruner.

Panasonic has selected a single Ku-band satellite operator to provide transponder capacity and geographical coverage at least equivalent to Connexion’s. “With an initial fleet of 500 aircraft we would anyway pay significantly less for transponders than Connexion,” Bruner points out. “But our technical solution will also be more efficient than theirs, allowing us to put more traffic through each transponder and thus reduce our total requirement for satellite capacity.”

The company sees itself as a system designer and integrator and has no intention of incurring the costs associated with being a service provider. The unidentified satellite operator would be responsible for system management, operation and capacity planning, and Panasonic is in talks with a global wireless roaming company for the provision of services such as customer care, billing and retail promotion.
------------
Mr. Bruner also operates under a different title: David Bruner, Corporate Communications which we found on the company web site.

Iceland group buys large AMR stake

Iceland's FL Group is now the third-largest shareholder in AMR with a 6% holding. FL group has been investing in European airlines for a while and now feels the US market is ready for an upswing - especially AMR. It is easy to understand that AMR has been very well run through the recent industry thrashing. AMR has simply and quietly gone about its business, cutting costs and staying afloat.

As this chart demonstrates, AMR is a good place to put your money if you like airline stocks. This is a one year chart. The blue line is AMR and the red line is the AMEX airline index. When AMR came back this last summer, its performance was stellar.

If this chart is not enough to explain why FL Group made its decision, the these two link 1 and link 2 should make it clearer.

American Airlines should get China route

In an interesting piece written by Charles Leocha on MSNBC, an argument is made that American should get the new China service because it is the best corporate citizen of the carriers in the application.

His arguments are solid; but we know this process is riddled with politics. Leocha recognizes this, too. The change of wind direction in DC is going to play a big part. The coming Democratic majority in transporation is, shall we say, northern centric. So despite awful labor relations, Northwest must fancy its chances. If only American did not have the pilots disturb a good route case application we might also see this going American's way. Democrats love big, unionized labor. This route case is is now much less easy to predict. No matter who wins, the yelling will be very loud among the losers.

So, which airline gives the most upgrades out of DCA?

Dummy of the week #52 - Don't slap an air marshall

CNN reports --
• Unruly man upset after attendants stopped serving him liquor • The man he allegedly slapped was federal air marshal • Passenger to be charged with interfering with flight crew • US Airways Flight 1295 en route from D.C. to Fort Myers, Florida

Bet this guy is on the TSA watch list now.

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

United's Holiday Treat - a Fare Sale

United Airlines filed a broad fare sale last night with an average savings of $146 per one-way fare in 7,912 North American markets. This fare sale applies to a significant portion of United’s North American flights and comes on the heels of a system-wide $5 fare increase (one-way) last week.

American, Continental, Delta, Northwest and US Airways matched United’s sale this morning.

The sale fares require purchase at least 14 days before departure. Travelers need to buy their tickets no later than January 9 and must schedule their return flight on or before March 7. Sale fares to and from New York and Los Angeles are limited.

Source: FareCompare.com

Monday, December 25, 2006

China Airlines denies 747i order

The Economic Daily News (Taiwan) reported that the island's largest carrier is set to buy $2.50bn in new aircraft, probably 10 Boeing 747-8 passenger jets to replace its fleet of Airbus A340-300s and Boeing 747-400s. Subsequently Forbes has a story out denying this.

This airline has been reported to be flirting with a 747i order for over six months. Something is up you can be sure. Exactly what we can't figure yet. But with Lufthansa making its move we expect more 747i news early 2007 - and the news may not be from Taiwan.

Friday, December 22, 2006

Northwest Joins In on Airfare Increase

Northwest joined the network carriers by filing a $5 increase (one-way) in the 12:30 pm update today.

Now all of the network carriers have jumped in on this round of system-wide airfare increases.

There are three models for this fare increase.

American, Continental, and US Airways (one-way) - $5 for 500 miles, $10 for 1,000 miles, $15 for 1,500 miles, and $20 for 2,000 miles

United & Northwest (one-way) - Flat $5 increase

Delta (one-way) - Flat $10 increase

Neil Bainton -- FareCompare

China tells fliers: Stop complaining!

China's civil aviation authority is asking fliers to stop complaining about domestic air travel there. Reuters puts it this way: "The food's bad, the airport coffee costs too much, the in-flight service is terrible, the flight's delayed and your suitcase got destroyed in transit -- well, it's your fault for having unrealistic expectations." Indeed, the General Administration of Civil Aviation of China is trying to quell a rising tide of passenger complaints there by adjusting expectations. "We hope to increase consumers' understanding about the special nature of the civil aviation industry, so that together we can create a cosier, more harmonious aviation travel environment," the agency says on its website.

"What must be stressed is that safety is at the root of airline travel, and on-board service revolves around this," it adds. Reuters says that fliers in China "have long got used to surly cabin crew, decrepit in-flight entertainment systems and mysterious delays where aircraft full of people are just left on the tarmac." But Chinese passengers have apparently begun to push back against the airlines –- sometimes refusing to leave late flights until they receive compensation or even storming runways to protest other service breakdowns, according to Reuters. Chinese airlines, however, say that most problems stem from passengers who are unfamiliar about what to expect from flying.

ArabMonitor has amazing piece on Middle East air space

Original found here. This is amazing news if true. Enemies talking about cooperation and aspects of regional air space management?

Beirut, 21 December - A news flash aired on Al Jazeera regarding a meeting between representatives of the Israeli and the Saudi Arabian governments with the Jordanian King in Amman to discuss ways of facing the "Iranian threat" connects to what is being reported by Maan News Agency today. A meeting between Israeli Prime minister Ehud Olmert, Lebanese Prime minister Fouad Siniora and Osama al-Baz, political adviser of Hosni Mubarak, with the head of Saudi Arabian national security, Prince Bandar took place two months ago in Sharm el-Sheikh. According to Maan, the participants discussed mutual coordination and cooperation between Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Israel and the current anti-Syrian government in Lebanon in a joint effort to isolate Iran and Syria, as well as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Islamic Jihad. During the meeting Olmert is reported to have told Siniora that the deployment of international armed forces under Security Cuncil Resolution 1701 and the support handed out by the US to its allies in the region "has created a path, along which lies an unprecedented opportunity to get rid of the Iranian and Syrian allies in Lebanon". Yesterday the Lebanese Al-Manar TV channel reported that one Israeli military aircraft managed to land at Beirut international airport on 21st November, despite Lebanese aviation law forbidding Israeli aircraft from landing on Lebanese territory, with the exception of aircraft coming via Larnaka airport in Cyprus. In this context Al-Manar also said that eight of the Israeli jet's passengers stayed on Lebanese territory, while the other three departed with the aircraft which had not been received and controlled by Lebanese officers. The question was also asked why the Lebanese Corporation for the Safety of Civil Aviation is meanwhile being run with four unidentified US "experts" whose offices are on the fourth floor of Beirut airport and who receive each a salary of some 120 thousand dollars.

2007 the year of Virgin America?

An encouraging piece on this airline to be found here. FAA officials praised Virgin America's performance as exemplary. The airline said one FAA official noted, "I have done 35 certifications and by far this was the best I've ever seen."

We join Kieran Daly at Flight International in saying its time to let this airline face the market. Let them start their business becuase they have been hammered enough without the benefit of generating any revenue. If they are going to be as good as they say, let them go for it.

Inflight Internet in Holding Pattern

In case you were wondering how things look for in-flight Internet, here's an update. Things don't look good. The Connexion system goes dark in the next 10 days. There is nothing out there to replace it. Its going to get tougher to restart Connexion-type service. The airlines seem to want to stick with known names and known brands. But is it not fascinating that they cannot get the system back up? What are these big firms missing? How come they are unable to execute?

One would think the content suppliers are pushing to get back in-flight and customers who are used to in-flight demands remain. There are obviously pushing forces and there are pulling forces. What is missing from the pieces to get this going?
---------
WSJ -- Inflight Web in Holding Pattern As Obstacles Spur Uncertainty
By ANDY PASZTOR
December 22, 2006; Page B5

A group that includes airlines, equipment suppliers and satellite companies hope to breathe new life into an effort to offer Internet access to plane passengers, even though Boeing Co. pulled the plug after investing about $1 billion in the project.

But so far, arguments over who will subsidize the money-losing venture, and how it can be modified to make it more appealing to passengers, have impeded progress, people familiar with the matter said. Any replacement service also is likely to be more limited in number of planes and geographic coverage.

A Lufthansa AG spokeswoman said the carrier is seeking a way to restart Boeing's Connexion in-flight Internet system toward the end of 2007. It leads a group that includes the Panasonic Avionics unit of Japan's Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.; Luxembourg satellite-operator SES Global SA; and Connexion subcontractor ViaSat Inc. of Carlsbad, Calif., the people familiar with the matter said.

A spokeswoman for SES declined to comment. A spokesman for ViaSat said "there is certainly a desire" to restart the service but operating costs "make that hard." A Panasonic spokesman said the company "is working aggressively with a strong list of partners" to push ahead "with a feasible business plan."

Financial and regulatory complications threaten to delay decisions at least until late summer or fall, with some industry officials predicting the service probably won't resume until early 2008. With costs estimated at more than $100 million annually, agreement may be unreachable.

David Friedman, a former Connexion vice president, said: "If you take away some of the service" over thinly traveled routes to Asia, Africa and some Pacific regions, "I believe the costs can be brought down to a manageable level."

A spokesman for Boeing said it isn't in the talks but keeps working with carriers and suppliers to phase out the service by Dec. 31. Korean Air, Singapore Airlines Ltd. and other large carriers have been involved in the latest talks, the people familiar with the matter said.

Continental, United, and US Airways Join In Increase - Northwest Last Hold Out

Continental and United joined the airfare price increase last night and US Airways joined in this morning. The only remaining network carrier that has not yet decided to join is Northwest Airlines.

What's interesting with this network price increase is that there are two models. American started the increase on Wednesday night using a distance-based price increase ($5 for 500 miles, $10 for 1,000 miles, $15 for 1,500 miles, and $20 for 2,000 miles). Delta decided to use a flat $10 increase (one-way).

At this point, Continental and US Airways have decided to use the American pricing model with increases based on flight distance. Delta and United are using the flat $10 model.

I would expect that if Northwest does join this price increase, the carriers will ultimately gravitate to one of the two models, i.e. a flat increase or distance-based increase in order to reach a new pricing equilibrium.

Neil Bainton
FareCompare

Mesa enters China

PRNewswire-FirstCall -- Mesa Air Group Inc. (Nasdaq: MESA - News), today signed a Joint Venture agreement with Shenzhen Airlines to create a Chinese regional airline, the name of which is yet to be determined. The new airline is expected to commence scheduled services within 12 months, initially operating 50-seat regional jets on domestic routes within the People's Republic of China. Focus cities for the new services will include Shenzhen, Beijing, Chongqing, Xiamen, Nanjing, Kunming, Dalian, Shenyang, Xian, Zhengzhou and Nanning.

China currently has just 70 regional jets in operation, flying for seven different carriers. The new carrier, Beijing Airlines, expects to have 20 50-seat regional jets in service prior to the Beijing Olympic Games in 2008, growing to more than 100 planes within five years, comprising a mix of 50, 70 and 90 seat regional jet aircraft.

Kenya Airways E170

This is how Kenya Airways E170 will look when its delivered in 2007. The airline ordered three and is leasing them through GECAS.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Farecompare.com fare news

Delta filed 28,341 fare increases in the 12:30 pm update today (Dec 21st). In contrast to the American increase that ranged from $5-$20 depending on the length of flight, Delta raised all its fares by $10 (one-way).

These fare increases are significant and network-wide with no specified end-date.

As with the American increase last night, the fare increases are primarily in the 3-day, 7-day, 14-day and 21-day advance purchase buckets.

Sample Fare Rules (ABQ-ATL 14-day):

Fare Class: L14M3NBV
ReservationsTicketing:
Latest Reservation: 14 days before travel begins
Ticketing: 1 day after reservation
Ticketing: 14 days before travel begins
MinimumStay:
Departure on: Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, Sun
Minimum Stay: 3 days
Departure on: Fri, Sat
Minimum Stay: second Sun
The Numbers:
ADV PURCHASE 3:
TOTAL INCREASES: 5,552
AVG: $19 MIN: $8 MAX: $20 (round-trip)

ADV PURCHASE 7:
TOTAL INCREASES: 8,362
AVG: $19 MIN: $2 MAX: $20 (round-trip)

ADV PURCHASE 14:
TOTAL INCREASES: 6,889
AVG: $19 MIN: $2 MAX: $20 (round-trip)

ADV PURCHASE 21:
TOTAL INCREASES: 4,804
AVG: $19 MIN: $2 MAX: $20 (round-trip)

OAG data

World’s scheduled airlines including low cost carriers offered a record 3.3 billion seats (3,297,362,597) on 28.2 million flights (28,240,490) during 2006, according to OAG. This is a average daily of over nine million seats on 77,371 individual flights.

Total seat offer year-on-year was up 3.4 percent from the 3.2 billion seats (3,187,855,301) offered in 2005 across 27.7 million flights (27,730,443). Scheduled flights increased 1.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 with 2,856 new direct or re-instated services being introduced during the year.

LCCs offered a total of 549,078,161 seats in 2006 on 3,815,204 flights, which represents 17 percent of the total number of scheduled seats on offer worldwide. Within the US the capacity share of the LCCs was 27 percent, slightly more than Europe where the offer was 24 percent. In the Asia/Pacific region, LCCs offered just nine percent of the total number of seats on offer by scheduled airlines in 2006, but the low cost sector has seen sizeable growth throughout the region when compared to 2005, with both seat offer and frequency up over 55 percent year on year.

Total low cost seat offer year-on-year was up nearly 16 percent globally in 2006 from the 474,080,924 seats offered in 2005 on 3,384,166 flights. Scheduled low cost flights increased 13 percent from 2005 to 2006.

“The facts show that scheduled airlines offered more seats in 2006 than ever before with more than three billion seats being made available to the flying public,” said Duncan Alexander, managing director, OAG. “At a very conservative estimate of a 70 percent load factor that means over 2.3 billion passengers will have flown during 2006. That is more than 6.3 million people flying every day of the year on either business or leisure.”

“Given the schedules already in the OAG system for the first quarter of 2007, the trend of more seats and flights being offered by the world’s scheduled airlines, and more people flying on both long and short haul, looks to continue,” he said.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Orbitz launches hotel notification service

Orbitz is launching a hotel notification service for customers who book a package (flight + hotel) through the website. If their flight is delayed, Orbitz will personally call customers and with their permission alert the hotel to let the front desk know they will be arriving late. In addition to late arrivals, Orbitz works for customers who may not make it at all to their hotel. If a flight is cancelled, Orbitz will personally call customers and with their permission work to rebook affected customers at a new hotel.

The new OrbitzTLC hotel alerts works in the following way:
1. When booking a package (hotel + flight), customers need to include a mobile phone number in their “traveler profile” so that they can be reached in-transit.
2. The OrbitzTLC Center will monitor the flights of customers who book hotel + flight trips and flag arrival delays that could mean late arrival to a hotel after midnight. This is the time when most hotels release rooms that customers with reservations have not checked in to yet.
3. OrbitzTLC Agents will personally contact customers via their cell phone to inquire if they would like Orbitz to call ahead to their hotel to ensure their reservation is honoured.
4. Once receiving customer consent, OrbitzTLC Agents will call ahead to a customer’s hotel to inform the property of the late guest arrival and ensure their reservation is honoured.

Small, mid-sized and large travel agencies already offer this capability by using FlightStats Attendant, a web-based console that lets them monitor all their active travelers to identify as early as possible (often while the traveler is still in the air) if they have missed a connection, suffered a cancellation or excessive delay. This gives the agent the most time to call hotels, ground transportation companies and other shareholders to update them and make changes.

The next generation of FlightStats Attendant (available early in 2007) will push real-time itinerary status information to agents, hotels and other trip shareholders based on business rules set by the traveler or the agent. FlightStats is the only company with global, real-time flight data, sophisticated triggered communications, and itinerary monitoring to be able offer this smart touch less system to empower agents and booking entities.

Its odd that Orbitz has not worked with ITA Software to incorporate this as a better solution. Maybe somebody else will get this tool online before Orbitz?

iPOD has been flying for months - quietly

Thales and Etihad have been offering the capability for several months. Thales’ TopSeries equipment in the Etihad fleet supports both iPod battery charging and display of video content on the in-seat screen, according to Brad Foreman, general manager at Thales Inflight Systems. “That capability is in service and has been offered by Etihad for the past six or seven months.”

“Every seat has a USB port, so you can plug in an iPod charger,” he says. “But on Etihad the passenger can also carry aboard an RGB cable bought for $30 at an iPod store, plug it into the iPod and the seatback, and display the device’s video content on the in-seat screen.”

One has to wonder how - and why - this news has not been heard before.Its kind of important and useful. It certainly gives the airline a leg up on its more vocal competitors in the region.

Airbus breaks Israeli drought

Israir buying two A320s making it the first Israeli airline to operate Airbus planes.

Israir has signed an MOU to buy two Airbus A320s, with an option on a third, for $150 million. A final contract will be signed in a few weeks. (We have not been sent any official Airbus PR on this yet).

Israir will receive the planes in 2010. Meanwhile, the airline will lease planes from Airbus, making it the first Israeli airline to operate Airbus. Airbus will apparently provide a complete support package, including training for air and ground crews.

With this breakthrough we think A330s for New York service might not be far behind. This is great news for Airbus. It is far more important than order size.

787 to displace Airbus again?

This news reinforces the invincibility of the 787. This plane eats into the 330/340 sales with impunity. It would be “natural” for the airline to stay the course with A330s and then A350s. Yet Boeing is about cut loose Airbus from another all-Airbus fleet with the 787-scalpel.
-------
AFP -- National carrier Royal Jordanian has said it is negotiating with Boeing to buy Dreamliner long-haul planes to replace its Airbus fleet. "RJ is conducting negotiations with Boeing and other international firms to purchase four to five 787-8 Dreamliner planes," airline chief Samer Majali said in a statement Wednesday. The new planes would replace Airbus 340 aircraft due to be phased out from 2010 as part of an overall strategy to renew the Royal Jordanian fleet, he added.

Online Shoppers Plan to Spend More

Hot on the heels of news that Cyber Monday was the biggest shopping day in online history comes the annual e-commerce survey from the investment firm Cowen and Company that reports that 41% of Internet users plan to increase their e-commerce spending in 2007. The report suggests, however, that sites such as eBay and Amazon may be reaching the saturation point as far as U.S. Web user penetration goes and that future growth will increasingly have to come from expanding the amount purchased by existing users. Competition for the increased online spending dollars will be fierce, and next year search advertising will play a more important role than ever. The survey found that fewer consumers are beginning the shopping process by going directly to company Web sites, while more are going to search sites. Currently, 55% of consumers state they are starting their online shopping at search destinations, compared with 51% last year. (Source: eMarketer)

Internet Generation to Fuel Further Online Travel Growth

Internet advertising grew by 66% last year, greatly aided by the increasing availability of broadband connection and new technology. Travel websites allowing video streaming of destinations and accommodations have become increasingly more sophisticated with technology allowing site users to personalize information taken from the site. $115 billion worth of travel product is now sold worldwide online. Other internet developments such as podcasting, viral advertising and the interactivity of blog sites have created a new and effective way to reach the traveling public, especially the internet savvy younger generation. The 'internet generation' of 15-24 year olds who spend three hours a week on the net will drive future growth of online travel. More than a quarter of the younger age group said they spend more time on the net than they do reading national newspapers, a traditional medium for travel advertising.(Source: TravelMole)

Dummy of the week #51 - Granny or TSA?

Baby OK after being sent through LAX X-ray machine

A passenger surprised screeners at Los Angeles International Airport after she sent her month-old grandson through the X-ray machine in a plastic bin intended for fliers' personal belongings. In an event the Los Angeles Times (free registration) calls "bizarre but not unprecedented," the baby was first noticed by a screener who caught the child's outline on the X-ray machine and immediately pulled the bin backwards out of the x-ray machine. The baby was taken to a local hospital, where doctors determined the infant's exposure to radiation from the X-ray machine did not hit dangerous levels.

The unidentified 56-year-old woman who sent the baby through the machine apparently did not understand English, something that may have contributed to the mix-up, according to the Times. The paper adds that "the rare incident drew attention to whether officials are staffing often-busy security checkpoints enough to prevent such an accident." The Times cites TSA spokesman Nico Melendez in writing that "the agency doesn't have enough workers to constantly stand at tables in front of the screeners to coach passengers on what should or should not be sent through X-ray machines."

Singapore Airlines buys nine more A380s

Singapore Airlines plans to acquire nine more A380s plus six options.

The airline will lease 19 Airbus A330s and its regional airline, Silk Air, is ordering 20 Airbus A320s, SIA said at a press conference. The A320 order is worth $1.33 billion and the aircraft will be delivered between 2009 and 2012. "We are very pleased today to reach agreement with Airbus for a second tranche of A380s. We are looking forward now to delivery in October and commencing services very soon after," said SIA's Chief Executive Chew Choon Seng.

Singapore Airlines is expected to take a decison on the purchase of Airbus A350 aircraft by next month, Airbus chief operating officer John Leahy told a news conference in Singapore on Wednesday.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Sukhoi wins order for Superjet 100

Bloomberg -- Sukhoi, a unit of OAO Sukhoi Aviation Holding, won a $170 million order from Dalavia Far East Airways (based in Khabarovsk, Russia, on the Chinese border) ordered six mid-range Superjet 100s with an option for four more.

In the small world of 100-seaters this is news. Embraer is very busy and Bombardier still does not have a plane this size. Every month that goes by without Bombardier's Cseries being launched means another month for Embraer - and now Sukhoi to take orders. Sukhoi is doing all its business in Russia and appears to have sold over 100 - if the orders are credible.

C17 program saved - for now

Boeing has been awarded a $2 billion fixed-price contract for 10 C-17 transport aircraft added by Congress to the Air Force's budget for fiscal 2007, which began on October 1. These planes will be completed by October 2009. The aircraft were already factored into Boeing's C-17 production plan. Coupled with recent international C-17 orders and commitments, the new Air Force order would keep Boeing's C-17 production line in Long Beach, California running until late 2009. Production briefly shut down in August and work was halted on four planes before Congress added the new aircraft.

Carrier landing video

Another delivery works for Boeing

F111, F18F & F35 Australia is retiring its F111s, the last of which stops flying in 2012. The plane entered service with the RAAF in 1973. This is an amazing run for the plane.

Australia has ordered F35s. These will only arrive after 2014, leaving the RAAF with a strike gap between 2010 and 2014. The RAAF has decided to only consider the F18F (according to FI) for the gap years.

So Boeing wins again - how much good fortune does this company have?

Delta's plan

Delta came out with its own plan to emerge from Chapter 11 today. It is full of information and even has a funny exclusion - "The figures don't include an executive compensation package, which the airline says would be added later." Now why would that be excluded you ask? (You should ask this now and again at the end of this story)

Here's the essence of Delta's plan:

  • A valuation between $9.4bn and $12bn. That’s a 20% spread and is 10-30% higher than the existing US Airways bid. On what grounds is that valuation being made? Its the first a few odd items. Advantage US Airways.
  • Delta offers no cash payout to creditors. Which is odd because you would think creditors have been burned and want cash which is why US Airways is offering some cash. Advantage US Airways.
  • The blueprint for a new Delta is an all-equity valuation with no cash payout to creditors, who would receive a return of 63% to 80% of the current value of their claims. How is this calculated? Is it based on the inflated stock valuation (due to the US Airways bid)? Advantage US Airways.
We expect Wall Street to tear this deal apart and compare it with the US Airways offer. So far it does not look good for Delta. We think Delta's plan seems rather weak particularly since there's no cash to creditors. If this demonstrates Delta has no cash to use, that should tell the story right there. Because you would think that with lower fuel costs and an eviscerated cost structure under Chapter 11 would have generated buckets of cash. Where is that money?

Update - in order to allow readers to another view please see Delta's plan in their own words here. Delta's spin can be seen here.

On being Christian and working for a British airline

This blog is not about politics or religion, it is about travel and technology. There has been a rise stories around Christians doing their jobs in travel. Its getting tougher to be a Christian if you work for a British airline. Particularly if you are a proud Christian. British Airways gave an employee a hard time for wearing a cross. Now BMI is giving an employee a tough time because she travels with her Bible and they will not let her fly to Saudi Arabia with it. More on that story here.

Why is it that religious discrimination seems to always go one way? Its always "Western" religions that must defer? Since the UK is an open society where you may practice whatever religion you choose, how can the Saudis still get away with behavior what can only be described as intolerant and xenophobic? At what stage do traditionally Christian societies say "enough"?

UPDATE -- bmi has issued a statement rubbishing claims in the Sun newspaper that the company has banned bibles on its flights to Saudi Arabia.

The statement reads as follows: Contrary to a misleading and inaccurate newspaper report, bmi has not banned bibles on services to Saudi Arabia.

The UK Foreign Office issues guidelines which are openly available to everyone at www.fco.gov.uk to ensure that individuals and employers are aware of local laws, customs and practices throughout the world.

This information is shared with operational crews to ensure they are familiar with these requirements, which in the case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, carries specific references to religious materials.

The airline is a responsible employer and as such treats the welfare and safety of its staff with the utmost importance. It also expects its staff to respect the local laws in force in all areas of the world where the airline operates.

Monday, December 18, 2006

Airbus' freighter blues

Airbus needs a new freighter. In fact, even an old freighter might do. The talk about airlines asking after the A300F is still talk. Airbus is unlikely to restart the line unless airlines of the magnitude of UPS and FedEx ask for 20 each. The A300 simply cannot be tweaked to make it more efficient. Boeing has the same issue with its 767F. These are old designs using old technology.

Airlines first started asking about an A330F in 2001. One has to wonder why Airbus has taken so long to get a program launched. We believe the A330F will get its industrial launch in the next 90 days. While the A300F might get a second chance, we are inclined to bet enquiries are being directed towards the A330F - a far more capable airframe.

As A340 deliveries are made (with few orders), more production slots open up for A330Fs. Its true the earliest delivery slots are in 2009 - which might make the A300F work in the interim - but demand for freighters is hot now. Airbus will not want to miss this opportunity.

Boeing struts its 747i stuff


Lufthansa searched the world for a more profitable route and landed here.... This ad appeared today and seems aimed squarely at irritating you know who.

Boeing delivers 600th 777

The 777 program reached this milestone after 11 years in service, faster than any other twin-aisle airplane program in history.

If the 787 really only takes 3 days to assemble it will achieve this milestone much quicker. We estimate the 787 could reach this milestone between 4.5 to 5 years, half the time of the 777. But Boeing has to sell 600 first.

By comparison with other aircraft deliveries:
A330(1988) - 2004 - 16 Years
A300(1974) - 1989 - 15 Years
B747 (1969) - 1984 - 15 Years
B767 (1982) - 1996 - 14 Years
B777 (1995) - 2006 - 11 Years

F35 - Lightning II

The plane had its first flight and Lockheed Martin has online video for you to watch. Try this link.

Sunday, December 17, 2006

TU-95 Bear

The Tu-95 Bear is perhaps the most successful bomber produced by Russian aviation, enjoying long service in a variety of roles and configurations. It was the only bomber deployed by any country to use turbo-prop engines, which provided extraordinarily long endurance at speeds only slightly less than comparable turbojet-powered heavy bombers. A truly amazing airplane. Not the latest technology - note the slide rule - but very capable.

SU-30 Flanker

Su-30 (Su-27P) is a two-seat long-range intercept fighter that first flew in December 1989, and that entered service with the Russian air forces in 1992. Largely based on the Su-27UB two-seat trainer, it has a new radiolocation system which can transmit the positions of 10 targets to four other fighters at the same time. The Su-30 is made in Irkutsk.

SU-35 Super Flanker

The Su-27M (factory designation T-10M) was conceived as an upgraded variant of the Su-27 'Flanker' incorporating a true air-to-surface capability. Although the capability to carry air-to-surface weapons was added to the baseline Su-27s, it was limited to 'dumb' bombs and unguided rockets. The Su-27 fire control system lacked a dedicated ground target acquisition and identification capability. The air-to-air capability would also be improved to restore the balance with the latest F-15 and F-16 fighters and the AIM-120 AMRAAM. The aircraft was later designated Su-35, although Su-27M remains the Russian military designation.

Saab Viggen's Reverse Thrust

What other plane could do this? Its amazing.

Pilot lands F-15 with only one wing

Boeing keeps winning into the close

Boeing and Kenya Airways announced that they signed an order for three additional 787-8s. Kenya Airways will receive its first 787 in October 2010 with the deliveries of the other nine Dreamliners extending out to late 2012.

In a separate release Boeing said that it received an order for two 777Fs. Earlier, Qatar Airways ordered twenty two 777s, deliveries of which start in 2007 extending to mid-2010. The airline notes that the Middle East has been experiencing continued strong air cargo growth and accounts for 5.8% of the world's tonnage in the region.

These are small but influential orders. Qatar is generally thought to be in the Airbus camp, so Boeing follow up orders are noteworthy. Kenya Airways is starting to follow the examples of other successful airlines - the 777 and 787 combination is expect to be powerful. Africa's only other serious airline, South African Airways, should pay attention.

Friday, December 15, 2006

A short piece of shameless self-promotion

We work hard on content and you get this free.

So we ask a small favor in return. Please take a look at the book shop (top left) and buy a few books.

More more thing - click on the ads. That helps too.

UK finesses Saudi "problem"

Replace Perfidious Albion with Emasculated Albion. Britain has signed up to an international convention saying that "national economic interest" cannot stand in the way of stopping corruption.

Attorney General Lord Goldsmith got up in the House of Lords and announced that the Serious Fraud Office had decided to give up its inquiries. The decision has been taken, he said, "following representations that have been made both to the attorney general and the director concerning the need to safeguard national and international security. It has been necessary to balance the need to maintain the rule of law against the wider public interest. No weight has been given to commercial interests or to the national economic interest".

Read the BBC's story here. What an appalling cop out.

Merger talk impacts China route case

A group of corporate travel managers has asked the US Transportation Department to reopen its decision-making process for new services to China now that United and Continental are in preliminary merger talks.

The Business Travel Coalition, which represents travel managers of large corporations, asked Transportation Secretary Mary Peters on Wednesday to re-evaluate the China proposals. Coalition spokesman Kevin Mitchell said a combined United-Continental would dominate new and existing China service to and from the United States. "The department should not be rushed in a decision with such strategic, long-term implications for travelers, communities and the competitive structure of this important market," Mitchell said.

American's application was changed because its pilots require a stop in Chicago on the outbound leg from DFW. Continental and United's cases may be impacted by the merger talk. Only Northwest has no impacts in its application. Of course the talk is that a CO-UA tie up might lead to an AA-NW tie up. DOT knows this.

So while Mitchell is correct to ask for a re-think by DOT, its kind of an obvious thing to do. That said, all four contestants are "in play". Therefore whomever DOT was going to select may as well be selected anyway.

Alitalia workers strike - is this still news?

Alitalia cancelled 225 flights on Friday due to a strike by pilots, ground and cabin staff.

The company is on its knees. Employees don't want to work. Why is the Italian government still supporting this company? Who, in their right mind, would buy this company without being allowed to give it a near death experience to see what is worth keeping?

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Procreation Vacations

One of the latest market niches a growing numbers of destinations are looking to fill: "Procreation Vacations." This is worth thinking about as we head into vacation mode.

"Resorts are offering on-site sex doctors, romantic advance and exotic food and drink calculated to put lovers in the mood and hasten the pitter-patter of little feet," says the Associated Press. USAToday also has a story on this. Also at Blogging Baby.

Boat Vs Plane Funny Video

Boat Vs Plane Funny Video

Feeling a bit seasick?

In a story written by our friend Chris Elliott, you can get a view on the recurring events around sick people and sick boats. The cruise industry seems to be having these issues regularly.

Don't think this is a regular occurance? Run this Google search and think again.

A380 "exempt"?

A story that must have come out on a slow news day, talks about the A380 as being "exempt from new U.S. rules designed to prevent fuel tank explosions like the one that downed TWA Flight 800 in 1996." Exempt?

This is a weird description of the process. The A380 was certified by both the FAA and the European equivalent agency. By certifying the plane both agencies did not exempt the A380 from anything - certification means the plane is in compliance.

This story also has a strange one line item that is not supported by any facts - "The FAA concluded that Airbus jets remain vulnerable." Really? If this were true would not every US airline using Airbus equipment be up in arms? What exactly does this statement mean? What facts support this statement?

The A380 has been through the wringer, more than once. This plane has been hammered from the start - remember the stories about Joe Mangan? Airbus engineers have had to double check everything more than once. Give it a break!

If the FAA certified the plane it can fly into and out of any anywhere in the USA its operators want. We have no reason to believe the FAA treated the A380 any differently from any other certification program. Where's the story here?

jetBlue removes some seats

Clever spinmeisters these airline people. It wouldn't do to say this is being done to reduce staff per flight from 4 flight attendants to 3. Or that less weight ensures winter transcons are more reliable.
-------------
NY Times -- JetBlue Airways, trying to improve its appeal to travelers and cut costs in one move, said yesterday that it planned to remove a row of seats from all 96 of its Airbus 320 planes, giving the front 11 rows 36 inches between seatbacks, instead of the current 32 inches.

Indian men "smaller" than average

OK, lets start by telling you this story has NOTHING to do with aviation. There could be a technology angle - but you have to be sort of creative to see it that way. That said, we find this story hilarious.

Saudi Typhoon deal - what happened?

Recall at the beginning of this month, there was lots of noise. The UK Serious Fraud Squad were on to some dirty dealing. The Saudis went nuts, threatening to kill the deal - there were reports they were going to buy a bunch of Rafales. (A good move BTW)

And since then? Not a word or even a whisper. This Google news search shows you how the story simply dried up - magically. We said the Brits would cave and we bet they have. Notice no Rafale sale has been announced. No Typhoon cancellation. No news is a win for the crooks and another loss for honest, open and clean government.

Euroland unhappy with US PNR data use

Its odd that this issue is still percolating. One would have thought by now the EC would just let it go. But no. The US is right to use this data as it needs to protect itself. Since 9/11 we have seen terror attacks in Europe, perhaps because the US is more vigilant it has had no successful attacks. The terrorists won't give up, neither should the US government. Europeans should worry more about their security - this privacy business is overstated.
------------
Reuters -- The European Commission asked the United States on Wednesday to confirm it was using the personal data of US-bound air passengers properly amid growing concerns over privacy rights.

An agreement between the United States and Europe in October gave US law enforcement agencies easier access to personal data on transatlantic air passengers but set limits on how that data could be used.

EU Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini said he asked the US government for clarification after a description published last month in the US Federal Register about its use of the data had raised concerns among lawmakers and privacy rights groups on both sides of the Atlantic.

"We have sent today a letter to the US government to ask formal confirmation that the way European PNR (Passenger Name Record) data are handled in the ATS is the one described in the undertakings," Frattini told the European Parliament.

The ATS, or Automated Targeting System, is a computerized system used by the US Homeland Security Department to scrutinize personal data on those crossing US borders and assess whether they are a terrorism or criminal threat.

Frattini said there were "significant differences between the way in which PNR data are handled within the ATS on the one hand and the stricter regime for European PNR data on the other".

EU lawmakers have repeatedly expressed concern that Washington has ridden roughshod over privacy after the September 11, 2001 attacks to further a "war on terrorism".

"This is a clear violation of the rights of EU citizens... It goes way beyond the fight against terrorism," Dutch liberal lawmaker Sophie in't Veld said of the ATS system, calling in the European parliament for a global standard on data protection to safeguard privacy.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

737-700ER in assembly

Boeing recently began final assembly of the first Next-Generation 737-700ER. ANA will receive the airplane in early 2007. With up to nine optional auxiliary fuel tanks and optional Blended Winglets, the 737-700ER is capable of flying up to 5,510 nautical miles.

It is going to be interesting to see where ANA uses the two planes it ordered.

A380 Receives Type Certification

The world's largest commercial airliner, the 555-seat Airbus A380, received joint European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Type Certification on December 12, 2006. The certified aircraft is powered by Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engines

The EASA A380 Type Certificate was signed by EASA's Executive Director, Patrick Goudou, and the FAA A380 Type Certificate by John Hickey, FAA's Head of Certification. The documents were handed over to Airbus' Executive Vice President Engineering, Alain Garcia. The ceremony, held at Airbus facilities in Toulouse, France, was attended by the Honorable Marion Blakey, FAA Administrator, and by senior officials from civil aviation authorities from several countries worldwide.

"This double seal of approval represents a key milestone for the A380 program," said Louis Gallois, Airbus President and CEO. "It recognizes the quality of the work performed by all those who have worked hard for many years on the development of this superb, new technology leading aircraft. My thanks go to all of them, including to the EASA and FAA teams, for this outstanding achievement. But more than anything, it provides clear evidence of the technical soundness of the A380, and confirms that the aircraft is meeting or exceeding the expectations in terms of performance, range, environmental friendliness, and cabin comfort. Both our customers and their passengers will love it."

The Certification by the two major international governing bodies comes after the A380 successfully completed a stringent program of certification trials which has taken its airframe and systems well beyond their design limits to ensure the aircraft meets - or even exceeds - all airworthiness criteria. The A380 is also the first aircraft to which 21st century certification standards were applied.

The flight test campaign also revealed that the aircraft is meeting the guaranteed performance both in terms of fuel burn and range. Because of its very low fuel burn, contributing to the lowest operating costs, it will produce very low emissions. An environmental champion, it is also quieter than any other airliner, meeting the stringent noise restrictions at London Heathrow. The A380 also has the quietest cabin in the skies and provides a very smooth ride. Finally, all the pilots who have flown it, enjoy its remarkable handling qualities.

Five aircraft have been involved in the intensive flight test program, four of which have Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engines with the fifth powered by Engine Alliance GP7200 engines. To date, the aircraft have accumulated over 2,600 flight hours in 800 flights, with over 80 airline and certification pilots having flown the aircraft. During its test campaign, the A380 was also welcomed at 38 airports around the world, proving its easy airport acceptance and compatibility.

The A380-800 is designed to carry an average of 555 passengers in a three-class layout over distances up to 8,000 nm/ 15,000 km. To date, Airbus has received 166 orders and commitments from 15 customers for the A380, with the first due to be delivered to first operator Singapore Airlines in October 2007.

Merger thoughts

I like FL/YX (AirTran/Midwest). Almost no overlap, similar fleets, and great fare repercussions if you live in, say, Rhinelander! It looks on the map like a perfect marriage. And it gives FL a place to build a midwest foothold. And, you've gotta admit, having a hub at both MKE and MDW effectively corners the Chicago market. Nice position to skim from.

Price seems a bit high for YX, though. I mean, I know inflation is significant, but TW only paid $300M for Ozark back in 1986. AA paid $447M for the TW LHR routes. UA paid $845M for the PA Pacific routes, as I recall. DL paid $600M (I think) for Western. So the better part of $290M for YX seems a little spicy. Any economics majors out there who can figure out inflation on the previous mergers can feel free to tell me how wrong I am.

Now, who is going to launch an attempt to buy Spirit? It's a route system that looks great...as part of someone else's route system. JetBlue? AirTran? It'd be great for AirTran, except for that whole Airbus thing!

CO/UA does make sense too, but I don't see it happening. The CO people are still too arrogant to admit that they need anyone or anything to remain competitive. The CO culture of 'we are the best, don't you forget it' just doesn't mix with merging with anyone else. And I am sure the CO employees would become surly, discontented and mean if it ever happened. Professionalism goes out the window when your seniority means nothing.

On paper this makes perfect sense. UA, weak in NY, suddenly has a stranglehold. UA, weak in Europe, has a lock. UA, invisible in Latin America suddenly is the number 2 carrier. CO, weak on the West Coast, minimalist in the Pacific, utterly ignorable in the Midwest and intermountain area, suddenly has a new presence. Which is why NWA will fight this deal to the end.

We could probably say good bye, and good riddance to Dulles for UA, but there's nothing wrong with that (Gotta really sting Kerry Skeen and the folks at Independence - it's all about timing!). And wouldn't this mean that the CO EWR-LGW trips could be moved to LHR? Even if UA keeps a couple of IAD-LHR legs, this still gives them a key route! This would be the first truly balanced international carrier...ever.

And if NWA gets into too much of a tizzy, give them IAD for a song. Much like they hosed their DCA mini-hub (inherited from EA in the 1980s-1990s) they will find a way to waste this too. And pay NWA something for those golden shares, enough, say, to buy Delta? Or someone else, but it will probably be worth the effort. Of course, would NW want to sell to UA given that getting rid of CO marginalizes NWA in the South, on the East Coast, and in Latin America and the Caribbean (in fact just about everywhere)? A surviving NWA doesn't offer much to travelers not in its hub cities or in the upper Midwest, or who aren't million milers with UA and want to get to the Pacific and get an upgrade enroute.

NWA might be the one carrier to be hurt most by the wave of mergers, and might be one who MUST merge with someone to remain viable. NWA is great as a carrier...when you have no other choices. Not a lot of markets left where that gets you anything. Maybe American can get the deal of the century here? That is, if Air France/KLM can live with losing a core partner to One World

Each of these mergers makes more sense than DL/US. Fascinating. But in the end, we know mergers are bad, and mergers among Legacy carriers are worst.

Paris Tyler

Could a merged United and Continental allow for Open Skies?

In an interesting piece of aviation analysis by Philp Tozer at Aviation Interactive News, he asks the question of how the US might feel about open skies if United and Continental merge.

It is a good question. If the legacy carriers start to merge and become massively more powerful, then a real open skies scenario might not be a threat. No question the merged airlines would have immediate economies of scale. Certainly the overseas shareholding limitations will be no big deal because merged US airlines will be global colossuses. No overseas airline could pose a "threat" (more on this below). Moreover, at least in the short term, merged airlines will try to hold the line on rising fares and limited capacity growth.

We remain convinced that if the six US majors (excluding Southwest of course) merge into three then consumers will lose in the short term. Startups will always nibble at the fringes but pose no pricing - Southwest does this on its own. To provide consumers protection while allowing for a stronger US domestic airline industry, we would like to see a completely open market.

We would like to see no cabotage limits – make it a really open sky deal. By giving the US carriers carte blanche to merge their way to survival, consumers would be best protected by allowing the US aviation market to be completely open. That would mean you could fly British Airways between Chicago and LA. Or LA to New York on a Singapore A380.

With merged airlines, there would be slots available and many people with airline skills looking for work (laid off by the mergers). Sounds kind of attractive and it would do wonders for domestic US in-flight service improvements.

Aeroflot toying again

Russia's least credible airline is at it again - fleet planning in public. There is a story here worth looking at.

Problem is who believes them anymore? Fleet decisions have become a political issue in Russia. The airline has no say or it would have stayed on the 787 bandwagon. The Kremlin blew that deal - big time - much to the frustration of the airline's managers and it main shareholder.

If this latest story is to be trusted as real, it certainly presages an A350XWB deal. But then again, who knows? By 2010 Putin will be gone and (hopefully) replaced by a more open politician with no airline-as-foreign policy urges.

Dummy of the week #50 - Camels and Turks

In an atrocious celebration choice, Turkish Airlines technical staffers decided to sacrifice a camel at the Istanbul airport. We kid you not. In case you find this story does not turn your stomach enough, there is more here.

One crazy thing is that Turks are Muslim. As the second link amply explains, camels are not “clean” and appropriate eating for a Muslim. Can you imagine the mess?

Reading this and comprehending that the sacrifice of an animal is how Turks express happiness leaves this American unsurprised by the EC’s reluctance to admit Turkey.

Musical chairs speeds up in US

Today's WSJ reports that airline consolidation is rapidly developing. UAL and Continental Airlines are holding talks on a possible merger. AirTran proposed Wednesday to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Midwest for $11.25 per Midwest share in cash and AirTran stock or a total equity value of about $290 million.

This process is nowhere near over. The big daddy, American is far too quiet. They could swallow anyone except Southwest. However, an earlier digestive issue, TWA, is making them very careful. (Who said Northwest?) What happens to Frontier? Is Spirit attractive to anyone? This could go on and on.

So as this process unfolds ponder the higher - much higher fares - and even less capacity. That is what everyone is saying. However, analysis from Ernie Arvai suggests we are headed back into the red ink abyss in the airline sector. In addition, this is an industry that as it consolidates, will push more capacity into the system because the end game requires huge market share.

Musical chairs is not a nice game to play - the fair maidens will hook up quickly, leaving the dogs to struggle.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Airbus has a great production process

As we head into the close of 2006, it looks like Boeing is back on top. But there is another side you won’t hear too much about from Seattle. Take a look at this chart.

Using 1999 as a base year, Boeing has been beaten in delivery efficiency by Airbus – by a huge margin. Even though Airbus started from a much smaller base, they have been steadily out performing their delivery rates year after year. Boeing, on the other hand, is now only back at its 2002 delivery performance. Boeing has greater production capacity and when the 787 production starts, its ratios should shift. Second production lines clearly have significant impacts but Boeing seems wary of its work force rather than market demand. Airbus appears to be much less labor unrest sensitive. Moreover, when the A350 production starts, Airbus should also see some ratio changes.

Here is another piece of data worth looking at. This table is a ratio of orders to deliveries. Clearly both companies want to get more orders than deliveries. Any year below 1.00 means deliveries outpaced orders. Over the period, Airbus averaged 1.51 orders per delivery compared to 1.39 for Boeing.

Seventy seven percent of Airbus’ production is in single aisle planes compared to 73% for Boeing. We assume that Airbus has been able to out produce Boeing in the single aisle market. While Airbus has met with challenges over the past year in its twin aisle lines, its single aisle production sets the bar. That said, Airbus has to fix its twin aisle programs urgently because this has become the Achilles heel.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Storm in a kiddush cup*

What is it with the Rabbis and travel this week? Now they want to set up their own airline? Rabbi Yitzhak Goldknoph, secretary of the Rabbinic Council for the Holiness of Shabbat has plans. He also has detractors - "Goldknoph hasn't got the first idea what it takes to run an airline, even a charter company,"

It might be an idea if the Imams banned any of their faithful from flying with infidels. That should really fragment the market; Jews on one airline, Muslims on another and everyone else on whatever is left.

*A kiddush cup is typically a small cup (of wine) used for blessings

[This story is tongue in cheek - nobody should take offense.]

US traffic - 24 hours of beauty

This is a very interesting sight. It depicts flights across the U.S. in time-lapse over a couple of 24 hour periods.

It has already garnered nine awards:
#49 - Most Viewed (All Time) - Arts & Animation - All #39 - Most Viewed (All Time) - Arts & Animation - English #87 - Top Rated (All Time) - Arts & Animation - All #37 - Most Discussed (All Time) - Arts & Animation - All #27 - Most Discussed (All Time) - Arts & Animation - English #46 - Top Favorites (All Time) - Arts & Animation - All #39 - Top Favorites (All Time) - Arts & Animation - English #79 - Recently Featured - All #16 - Recently Featured - Arts & Animation - All

WILL AMERICAN LAUNCH THE BOEING 797?

American is facing a major fleet replacement decision. It's MD-80 fleet, of which 303 are in active service, is about 20% less efficient than the 737-800, which it also operates. However, American faces a new decision, as the 737NG is scheduled to be replaced by a new aircraft within the next decade.

Boeing is meeting with airlines about requirements for its 737RS, or replacement study, aircraft, and is in the process of finalizing a design concept for what will become the 797. Combining new engine technology (potentially the geared fan PW8000 from Pratt & Whitney) with the composite airframe technology from the 787, the 797 will likely be 20+% more efficient than existing models, which are themselves 20% more efficient than the MD-80s American needs to replace.

American must balance its need immediate savings with the 737-800, versus long-term savings with the 797. Historically, it is economically advantageous to purchase a model early in its lifecycle rather than late in its life cycle, and it is becoming late in the 737 life cycle. Nonetheless, Boeing still has 5 years of orders for the 737NG on the books at current production rates, and the popularity of the aircraft remains quite high.

With Boeing already launching the 787, 747-8 and 777-200LR, it can now turn to the narrow-body market. With Airbus financially strapped by its A380 and second try at the a delayed A350 program, it needs to generate cash from its narrow body A320 family, which is scheduled for an increase in production. A window of opportunity exists for Boeing to competitively attack Airbus cash cow with a new technology product just as Airbus needs to generate additional cash flow from a product it cannot afford to replace it until 2015.

There is an opportunity for Boeing to "one-up" Airbus across the board if it moves more rapidly to introduce the 797, and force Airbus to react when it is already strapped with two major development programs that have exceeded initial estimates. Boeing took a bold gamble with the 787 and won, and could do the same with a new technology 797.

As a result, we expect Boeing to accelerate its development process, if engine technology becomes available, and American to be a potential launch customer for that new technology aircraft.

While American will likely purchase a few additional 737-800 aircraft to augment its existing fleet and replace MD-80s in some markets, I would expect American to wait for the 797 for replacment of the majority of its MD-80 fleet if Boeing can deliver new technology by 2013.

Ernie Arvai www.arvaigroup.com

Imams, Rabbis and travel - who's next?

We have been following the unfortunate ElAl vs Rabbis fracas in Israel and now this in Seattle airport.

Between Imams and Rabbis, will we survive flying? What other religious leaders are waiting in the wings to add to your travel irritation?

777 - The magical aviation number

In what is becoming almost tiresome, Boeing's 777 keeps winning plaudits. The airplane has proven to be a winner everywhere it is delivered – no customers express frustration or disappointment. Boeing has managed to tweak this airplane so that in its latest variation, the plane seems perfect.

News from Singapore further bolsters the 777s reputation – “Boeing 777-300ERs in our experience would be a useful alternative to A380s,'' Singapore Airlines Chief Executive Officer Chew Choon Seng said. Ouch. The 777 is an alternative to the A380? Emirates have also started buying more 777s and they are publicly miserable about the A380 delays.

Can the 777 also eclipse the A380 after it already did this to the A340? The superb 777 even forced Boeing to stretch the 747i because its performance is too close for comfort. Nothing can be that perfect. Or can it?

Lack of freighters may resuscitate A300F

FI reports that Airbus is considering restarting the A300-600F line if they get 50 or more orders. Fifty is a long shot - but indicates the A330F is not moving as quickly to industrial launch as expected.

Air freight demand is growing worldwide and there is insufficient lift. The AN124 is going back into production. Boeing 747-400s converted to freighters are popular. Airbus cannot afford to miss out on this market. The A300 went through numerous updates and likely could be updated again and remain a credible freighter. After all, the 767 is still around, sort of.

UK buys into Airbus

FI reports -- The UK government has become the largest investor in a €50 million ($65 million) Airbus-led initiative to develop a more environmentally-friendly and more cost-effective wing.

While this investment is small and impacts about 100 people, it is probably sufficient to make a big statement. That statement being the UK wants to stay involved with Airbus despite BAE's selling its stake in Airbus. The UK has a strong desire to keep Airbus' wing development and the A350XWB is starting to look like a Franco-Russian effort. So all the more reason to stake a claim now.

A380 certification tomorrow

Tomorrow is a big day in Toulouse. Good news for Airbus and its A380 program.

Footage of the A380 Type Certification ceremony will be available tomorrow (December 12) via satellite from Toulouse, France. The specifics are below, and note the transmission time is given in Greenwich Mean Time and it is NOT live.

Date : 12th Decembre 2006 Time : de 17.15 à 17.45 GMT Satellite : AB2 Transpondeur : F08 Channel : D Downlink frequency : 12665.25 in X position Symbol rate : 6.1113 FEC : 3/4

Varig to get 340s

In a story that has Air Canada written all over it, Brazil's Varig is reported to be acquiring two used A340s for next year. We hear reports that Air Canada is interested in increasing its stake in Varig. Note also that despite Varig's collapse, the airline remains within the Star Alliance.

Sabre for sale - WSJ

In a report out this morning, the WSJ reports that Sabre is for sale. "Travel-booking company Sabre Holdings Corp. has hit the auction block, according to people familiar with the matter, and could be sold to a new buyer as early as this week at a premium to its $3.75 billion market capitalization."

Private-equity groups are viewed as the most likely purchasers of Sabre the WSJ reports. The Travelport/Worldspan consolidation from last week started a process that now seems fully in play.

Mobile entertainment market to reach $47 billion by 2009

Currently worth $17 billion, the global mobile entertainment market will grow to $47 billion by 2009 and $77 billion by 2011. These numbers have serious consequences for IFE and come from UK-based Juniper Research.

The company sees strong growth in mobile entertainment revenues; from gambling, games, music, television and infotainment just as broadcast mobile TV and mass-market casual games take off. The market will be dominated by Asia-Pacific (37%) and Europe (35%) of global revenues.

Music is currently the largest sector, followed by infotainment - sport, leisure and information products. But the report expects their domination to shrink as next-generation mobile network technologies become more common and consumers appreciate the range of entertainment options mobile devices make possible.

Juniper believes that by 2011 revenues from games and TV will overtake those from music. The value of bets placed through mobile devices will also have exceed that of music industry. It is not clear how gaming will occur in the US.

“There are tremendous opportunities in mobile entertainment over the next few years,” says Juniper senior consultant Bruce Gibson. “Busy lifestyles in both developed and developing markets mean that consumers will have to grab entertainment and relaxation as and when they can. Growing disposable incomes, next-generation mobile technology and the metamorphosis of the mobile handset into a multifunction communications and entertainment device will enable them to do this in a way hitherto thought impossible.”

Saturday, December 09, 2006

Zimbabwe vs Russia

In a remarkable tale of intrigue, Zimbabwe government officials and Russian aviation people are having a tough time concluding a fleet renewable scheme for Air Zimbabwe.

It is reasonable to expect the deal will not be concluded in Moscow. We expect another round to occur in Harare. Even then, it does not look good. Zimbabwe does not have the money and the Russians are not in a giving mood.

US Airways won't fight over Delta deal

  • Is USAirways afraid of the true depth of potential pilot backlash? United is already seeing that. As the profitability starts to creep back into their books, their pilots are asking for a share. If USAirways can go out and make this acquisition, are their pilots thinking that the expanding pie should be benefitting those who have given a lot to make the carrier profitable? And is there a belief that the pilots will sabotage the deal, and the airline, the closer this gets to fruition?
  • A more radical thought. Is this the deal Doug Parker really wanted? Let's not dismiss this easily. He went to Wall Street, said he had a plan, said he would achieve synergies, said he could make this deal pay for itself and, as a result, got the money. But Parker, and everyone else involved has to already be aware of how much of a non-starter this deal really is. This deal has a small chance of rolling through the regulatory approval process, given the amount of concentration that will take place on the East Coast.

    The reduction in industry ASMs that everyone seems to think will happen raises a flag to begin with. There will have to be cuts. Slots, gates, shuttles, routes, hubs, some things have to go. And if things start to get shed, that will anger various employee groups. Poor morale can kill a carrier.

    And if they cannot combine the carriers and reduce capacity, is it really worth it? Do you want to gain SLC and CVG and ATL and JFK, but lose PIT and CLT? Does the deal still make sense if you lose a major hub?

  • Parker knows DL will not do this willingly. There are too many entrenched interests at DL that will be in the unemployment line, possibly for a long time, after this deal goes through. So he must want a way out of this deal.

    Sure, he could be putting on the nice face to make it sound like he is not engaging in a hostile takeover, but it is just a face. Once DL says 'No' the first time, if USAirways still pursues, it is a hostile takeover, even if there are friendly overtures, kisses, roses, candy, flowers, and a big fat $8.5m ring.

  • Or does Parker want to start a bidding war? What better, easier way to strengthen your position than to weaken the positions of your competitors? Put a competitor into huge debt and hamstring them with seniority issues, new contracts, expensive aircraft integrations, bad morale, and general inefficiencies. And then, in 3 years, after the merger collapses under its own weight, swoop in and buy the scraps for cheaper than you'd be spending during a merger.
  • Let's take it as Parker threw this deal on the table because it is the biggest he could get, which is reasonable. It showed he could get the money and put together a reasonable proposal. It also showed he is willing to deal. But let's further assume he knew it wouldn't fly. What is he really saying? Does he want something else? USAirways is a large and powerful and profitable carrier. But there are holes in the route system. Now that they have put together a proposal, it's not to hard to switch names. Who or what could they want?
    a)You know, there is a big hole in the middle of the country of the USAirways route system. Not a lot of midwest presence. Could Northwest be the real target, despite vehement protestations to the contrary? Or maybe something smaller like Frontier?
    b)USAirways/America West have never been able to make major trans-cons work. No JFK-LAX or similar. America West tried and failed. But with their USAirways strength in NY and HP strength on the West Coast, is it worth a second go? Better yet, why not just buy a certain carrier with a huge presence in those markets? One that operates A320s? Granted that there are not many carriers that truly are available for USAirways to purchase. UA is out of bankruptcy and thus pricey. AA is not on the block. Southwest isn't available. Alaska to me would be repeating the PSA disaster. Perhaps a large regional? Think DL wants to shed Comair?

    Otherwise we are staring at Northwest (possibly a bargain right now, though they are further through their reorganization than DL and have accomplished more and thus will be worth more and also the synergies that Parker references as being key to the deal may not be attainable. After all, NW and USAirways offer limited overlap (PIT and DTW, possibly CLT with MEM, but those are stretches) So there would not be a lot to cast off, not a lot to sell and thus not a lot of quick cash coming in to pay for the deal. And raising NWA wages to USAirways levels might bankrupt them! Think DL management has a siege mentality? CO is worse. That won't happen, though, admittedly, it makes for an interesting route system.

Of course, there's always JetBlue, Spirit, AirTran (still want an Atlanta hub? As with Midway in the 1990s, perhaps USAirways wants to eliminate a big threat to one or two of their hubs), Midwest and Frontier. Not a lot that would require the kind of money Parker is raising, but some things that could be intriguing nonetheless.

Oh well, it does still raise the question as to why he may be willing to walk away now that the fun is starting.

Paris Tyler

Friday, December 08, 2006

American Airlines stumbles in China route case

American stumbled badly here. Operating the flight through Chicago outbound and nonstop inbound is weird. The pilots action over this route seriously damaged the airline's route claims. The airline and its pilots obviously have not settled old scores. Now the whole team loses. So much for "big picture" vision. No route, no growth, no need for more pilots flying big jets. Is this hard to understand?
-----------
PRNewswire-FirstCall -- American Airlines today asked the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to approve a modification of its application for authority to serve the Dallas/Fort Worth- Beijing, China, market. American is applying to operate the U.S. to China segment as a through flight from Dallas/Fort Worth to Chicago and then Beijing. The return flight will be operated nonstop from Beijing to Dallas/Fort Worth as originally proposed. American will fly nonstop in both directions as soon as it is able to do so.

American is applying to operate the U.S. to China segment as a through flight from Dallas/Fort Worth to Chicago and then Beijing. The return flight will be operated nonstop from Beijing to Dallas/Fort Worth as originally proposed. American will fly nonstop in both directions as soon as it is able to do so.

Brazil's avaition in crisis - blame the foreigners and them let them go

Brazil is trying to appease its ATC staffers who have hobbled the nation's airports and aviation system. To apparently save face, the government is releasing the pilots but also charging them for the deaths. What a crock. Pilots flying in Brazilian air space need to pay attention to this matter and consider protesting their profession being impugned this way. Pilots fly where they are told by ATC and if there are radar blackspots, ATC needs to point the finger at the Brazilian state. The buck stops there, not in the cockpit.

Brazilian police on Friday charged two U.S. pilots with endangering air safety in the crash of a Brazilian airliner over the Amazon rain forest in which all 154 people on board were killed. The pilots have denied any responsibility for the crash.

Despite the charge, local media said the pilots were expected to be allowed to return home to the United States on Friday after their enforced stay at a Rio de Janeiro hotel following the confiscation of their passports.

While officials and the Brazilian media were quick to accuse the U.S. pilots in the first few weeks after the crash, media attention has recently shifted toward air traffic controllers, who complain of an excessive workload, low pay and blind spots in radar coverage.

jetBlue wants more of your money - following Ryanair model

CEO David Neeleman as JetBlue "seeks to catch up to competitors in generating side revenues from its passengers." Neeleman tells Reuters Television that he hopes to eventually double non-flight revenue. Also a priority for JetBlue: Boosting the sales of in-flight movies and alcoholic beverages sold through its website.

The wonder is that these ideas have been so long in coming. How about getting the in-flight Internet up and running, David? People will sign up on your web site, download the software and stick to your network like flies on, well, y'know.

This should not be hard to do since the fleet already has satcoms for TV. Its all about bandwidth and that American disease of never being out of touch or offline. Since Americans are hooked on this, why not feed that habit? It has virtually inelastic demand and jetBlue could probably score $200 per year from its best customers. If 100,000 customers sign up for this, you immunize 100,000 customers from flying anyone else plus deposit $20m in the bank over and above ticket revenues. By the way, selling Internet access would be money up front, which means its worth another 5% or $21m.

Air Canada provides fleet cost information

ATW reports -- Air Canada said new aircraft entering its fleet will continue to drive operating costs down.

  • The 777 is 26% cheaper on a CASM basis than the A340-500
  • E-190s have 18% cheaper costs per trip than the A319

Portable Missiles Proliferation

Portable anti-aircraft missile systems are proliferating without government control, making them available to terrorists or the mafia, a multilateral arms export control group says.

The best-known MANPADS are U.S.-made Stinger missiles and Russian SAM-7s. “Terrorist organizations have sought to acquire such missiles and use them against civil aviation,” said Australian ambassador Peter Shannon, who presided over a meeting here to mark Wassenaar’s 10th anniversary. “We estimate that some 50,000 MANPADS are in circulation outside official controls,” added a Western diplomat.

Thursday, December 07, 2006

Who blinks first? Too much & too much attitude

The Saudi government is apparently in talks to buy 36 Rafale fighter jets from the French regardless of how a dispute with the British over a rival $78bn Eurofighter Typhoon contract is resolved.

The Saudis say they are concerned about the worsening situation in the Middle East and has been buoyed financially by petrodollars. The investigation into corruption and dirty dealing over the Typhoon order is even scarier. The British are the Saudis are in face off. The British want to investigate and the Saudis want to stop all digging. You can figure out here what's going on.

Who blinks first? Perfidious Albion is our bet. At some stage you just have so much money you cop any attitude you like. With no elections to worry about, the Saudis do what they like. What great "partners".

US Airways and Delta - saga continues

Despite an apparent misquote from Doug Parker about not "fighting for Delta", other industry players seem keen on this deal going through. Reuters reports a number of people support the idea on the basis that it would remove industry capacity.
  • "This is still a troubled industry," said Tom Horton, chief financial officer of American Airlines parent AMR. "If this Delta-US Air deal were to proceed and were to result in a rationalization of capacity, that could only be healthy for the industry."
  • "I think anytime you talk consolidation you talk capacity reduction. No matter which combination you talk about there is some overlap of routes," said David Neeleman, chief executive of JetBlue Airways.
  • "Our interest is going to be primarily in what we can do on the asset side," rather than actively taking part in industry mergers, said Laura Wright, chief financial officer at Southwest Airlines.

Remove capacity? Fat chance. This is an industry that seems to attract anyone that has been infected by the smell of Jet-A and has access to some serious capital. There are always start ups in the wings. The lessors are sitting on jets in the desert and they will offer them to anyone who will lease them. GE is a prime example of a perennial source of airline support.

While on the subject of Delta, there is news of the sort to make the main creditors very happy. Delta said that it would order 10 Boeing 737-700 aircraft and convert five firm orders for 777-200ERs to longer-range 777-200LRs. This should make allies out of Boeing and GE.

Pity that US Airways can't provide a better order, or can they? Boeing would dearly love more US carrier 787 buys.

EADS gets good Pentagon news

The Air Force has agreed to drop criteria for its multibillion-dollar tanker contract that could have crippled the EADS bid. EADS wants to build the plane in Mobile.

True to form, real American political interests are displayed - "We obviously want good news in Mobile, ... we're talking about one of the biggest procurements in recent times," Rep. Jo Bonner, R-Ala., said. He is no ally of Boeing. Given the political nature of this procurement, we are likely to see the best and worst as matters move forward.

Boeing is doing so well commercially that it may not offer its 777 as a tanker. Airlines pay more than the Pentagon. The latter would benefit from bringing in a new vendor - EADS winning the recent helicopter contract was a good start. There is a lot at stake with the tanker order - decades of work for example. It may be less profitable compared to commercial work, but it offers stable revenues compared to the cyclical airline business. So expect Boeing to be aggressive because its current airline order surge will end.

With a very hungry EADS, the Pentagon is likely to get a great proposal. In fact, with an aggressive EADS, Boeing cannot be greedy. The Pentagon has a few bruises over Boeing procurements that may just favor EADS.

Brazil's avaition in crisis

Today's Globe&Mail has a story that points out Brazil's aviation industry has not recovered from the tragic GOL 737 crash. There seems to a serious lack of leadership - this vacuum is soon going to damage Brazilian tourism. Its not just Brazilian airlines being hurt.

Travelport confirms Worldspan link-up

Galileo’s owner Travelport has announced plans to merge with Worldspan.

The statement says "The transaction has been unanimously approved by the boards and major shareholders of both companies but consummation of the transaction remains subject to customary conditions to closing including regulatory approval."

Currently, over 750 travel suppliers, 63,000 travel agencies and millions of consumers globally benefit from the travel distribution services provided by these two organizations.

Consolidation continues. This ensures a much stronger GDS for the combined companies but we continue to view the GDS model as under threat. For example, Google will sooner or later (we're betting sooner) impact the travel space. Google has a very good team in place with seasoned travel experts. Yesterday's news about the API is a first step. Once travel suppliers open their inventory to Google, who needs a GDS?

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

Boeing's 747 an Edsel says Airbus North America Chairman

Boeing's Edsel? Ford wishes.

For a 1960's-era design this Edsel is having a stunning second (or is it third or fourth?) life. It is worth noting that the Boeing "Edsel" was being turned out before there was an Airbus.

In fact the first time the word "Airbus" appeared on an airplane, it was on the side of a 747SR! AW&ST has the black and white in their library.

What an unfortunate comment.

Allan McArtor, chairman of Airbus North America, calls the 747-8 "a brand new Edsel."

"The 747 is on its last legs," McArtor said during an interview. "It doesn't have any legs to stand one. Boeing is trying to breathe life into a 1960s era design," he said.

"There is only so much you can do with a plane," McArtor added. "But it is irritating. Boeing is getting orders only because of our inability to meet demand. Had we not stumbled with the A380, there would not be orders like the Lufthansa order for the 747-800."

Google's Checkout API - an online travel selling tool?

Internet users are familiar with eBay's PayPal API. We use it to sell advertising and find it works great. But this Google API is potentially disruptive to PayPal. Especially since Google intends to make its tool fee-free through 2007.

Google does not enter a market without intending to dominate it. Now ponder this for a bit. Everyone wants Google as a partner. When you sign up for their API, they ask if you already use adsense (we do). Google then integrates its advertising with the e-commerce API.

Imagine that you are selling travel online. By using adsense and this API you can target your customers, and then once you have them on your site, sell a travel deal with zero transaction costs. Now imagine you are an airline. Think how much you can save in transaction fees on every 1,000 sales. Assume a credit card purchase has a 1.5% fee and an average transaction at $400. Such a volume of business costs the airline $6,000 in fees.

Given that airlines like Ryanair sell 75% of their tickets online, this API is a golden solution. If we take the 1,000 sales number above, you can assume this might easily be one day's sales at an airline like Ryanair. The Google API solution could potentially save airlines over $2m per year. Watch credit card fees drop because of Google.

Pent up demand for Southwest in New England

An intriguing piece of analysis out today from Compete, Inc.

Their report indicates that an examination of web traffic to the top airline sites shows that Southwest captures the highest level of research activity among Massachusetts residents.

Every time we write something that includes the magical words Southwest Airlines, traffic from that company spikes. This news should be read by the airline. If the US Airways/Delta merger falters, then it is going to have to work harder on finding its way into the New England market.

ElAl and the Jewish fatwa threat

An amazing story out today from Israel. A group of Rabbis has decided to demand the airline not fly on the Sabbath or face a boycott from religious Sabbath-observant Jews.

If the boycott is enforced, religious followers are expected to respect the boycott. However, this boycott seems really odd to us.

There are many Israeli companies that "desecrate" the Sabbath already. Are they also subject to such a boycott? What about Israel's other two airlines, Arkia and Israir?

With so many airlines flying into Israel one has to wonder what the effect will be if a boycott is established. What does ElAl have that religious Jews require that no other airline has to offer? ElAl's most unique feature is its manic security focus and nothing special in terms of service. If the religious groups do not want to fly ElAl, that's great. But hammering the airline like this seems really unfair.

Brazil allows American pilots to leave

A federal judge in Brazil on Tuesday ordered the government to return the passports of two U.S. pilots who have been forced to stay in that country following the midair collision between a Embraer Legacy business jet and a Gol Airlines Boeing 737.

In related news, Brazilian aviation officials shut three major airports and canceled dozens of flights on Tuesday evening, in another day of chaos in the domestic aviation industry. Officials stopped all flights from taking off from Brasilia, Belo Horizonte and Congonhas Airport in Sao Paulo after an equipment failure early in the day caused air traffic controllers to lose contact with planes.
By the time the problem was solved, airports were packed and more than 300 flights were delayed. Civil aviation authorities said they were investigating the cause of Tuesday's equipment failure. Brazil's aviation system has had several instances of major delays in recent months due to foul weather and a work slowdown by air traffic controllers, who complain they are overworked.

The Brazilian ATC were quick to blame the pilots. Each time information came out it showed that ATC had probably made the mistake.

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Lufthansa buys the 747i

The deal is apparently to be announced tomorrow - 20 747-8 Intercontinentals plus another 20 options - total value $5bn.

This order is huge for Boeing and has been a poorly kept secret for weeks. Analysts at Lehman Bros. on Tuesday boosted their target price on Boeing's shares eyeing a potential 19% return on the shares, including dividends. EADS stock fell over 1% today.

It is another body blow to Airbus, because Lufthansa is a big Airbus customer. In September the airline ordered up to 60 Airbus (mostly single aisle) jets. This latest order highlights that Airbus can sell every single aisle plane it can make but struggles to get the twin aisle types to sell as well.

The bigger the plane, the bigger the profits. Boeing's sales this year have been for bigger planes; Airbus has approximately 30% dollar market share while in terms of planes it has over 40%.

This order also has downstream impacts - other airlines that do not have the technical expertise to be a launch customer have been waiting for a tier one airline to order the 747i (as we like to call it). No airline has better technical services than Lufthansa. This is an airline that easily can handle the risk of being a launch customer for any plane. Which are the other waiting airlines? We hear they include British Airways and Cathay Pacific for a start. Other airlines, particularly those which are big 747 operators, such as Qantas, are no doubt now going to give the 747i another look. Another downstream impact is that since the 747i uses the new GENx engine, Lufthansa may also be more disposed to the 787 which uses the same engine.

Boeing's order book keeps filling up and its delivery slots are becoming ever more scare. Lufthansa's move puts European competitors on notice, in a world of tight delivery slots, first mover advantage counts.

Dummy of the week #49 - don't fart around on American

This is SO funny to read and imagine happening. Must have been a real gas.

The FBI questioned a passenger who admitted she struck the matches in an attempt to conceal body odor, Lowrance said. The woman lives near Dallas and has a medical condition. The flight took off again, but the woman was not allowed back on the plane. American has banned her for a long time.

A320 and the geared fan engine

P&W 8000 GTF

In a great story at Flight International there is talk of Airbus being able to get ahead of the 737RS by using new engines on the A320. (Note also the points about a possible fraying of IAE) Airbus has held the view that the efficiencies depend mainly on engines. They have even tested new winglets and decided against them.

You can ead more about the P&W engine here. As you can see the engine has a higher than usual bypass ratio. This engine also has a lower fuel burn. Moreover, lower fan rotation speed allows for less noise which allows for a larger fan and this helps with lower noise. A bigger fan provides larger bypass ratio. The engine potentially offers more power for a comparable noise footprint. All this great - if it works. The gearbox for this engine is complex. Aero engines have a old history with breaking reduction gearboxes - back in the day when engines were not as reliable as they are today.

You can also learn quite a bit about this engine here and here.

Since Airbus worked successfully with P&W on the A318, things look pretty good for the A320. Boeing has shown no interest in this engine. P&W would really like to be on the 737RS though.

ILFC - Airbus' #1 headache customer?

Aircraft leasing firm ILFC has switched an order for five freighter versions of Airbus' A380 to the passenger version, Airbus sales chief John Leahy told Reuters on Monday. "We're deferring deliveries until 2013, 2014 and 2015," said ILFC Chief Operating Officer John Plueger.

This news sort of passed by for most people. It seems there is little good news about the A380. Actually this news is rather big. It says two things: ILFC does not see any customers for the A380F it can persuade to lease the plane. The deferred delivery adds to that - demand for the plane is simply not as it once was. ILFC was reported to be getting close with South African Airways on the A380. That airline, desperate for more lift into Heathrow, actually needs a solution but seems unwilling to go for the A380.

Finally, recall how ILFC's CEO tore into Airbus over the initial A350? He was really nice after the XWB was announced, but one has to think he bruised a few people over the summer. ILFC has become something of a headache.

Israel's Arkia plumps for the 787 after all

Arkia first ordered the 787-8 and later cancelled the order and got its deposit back. Now its parent company, US-based Nakash Group of America, announces an order for 2 787-9s plus two options. Delivery is set for 2012 - unless they cancel again.

What is of some interest here is that ElAl also ordered and then cancelled 787s. Also of some interest - what happened between Airbus and the Israelis? Is this a market Airbus finds more impenetrable than Japan?

Monday, December 04, 2006

Embraer delivers 200th E-Jet

COPA takes delivery of the 200th E-jet from Embraer. This delivery comes 33 months after the first delivery.

This delivery also gives Embraer a strong (and probably unchallengeable) lead in the 100 seater market. They have a 359 plane backlog. Bombardier won't catch up and probably nor will Sukhoi. We wonder if Boeing could catch them now if that company decides to enter this market.

Pilots vs. Computers

This post will irritate everyone who wears gold bars on their sleeves and walks through an airport to work. We, along with the rest of the great unwashed, pay to ride a plane. So we are entitled to benefit from improving technologies.

Last time we wrote about the subject of pilots and the possibility that technology might do a better job, jetBlue had their famous incident at LAX. The pilots landed the A320 and we concurred with everyone, the crew were magnificent. So please, just because we are bringing this subject up again, don't send hate mail.

See, we don't like stories like this. "The captain and flight officer were so engrossed in trying to re-program the [aircraft’s computer] that they both lost their critical situational awareness for a time." In addition - "The work overload meant that normal routine checks were not carried out and there was no questioning of the developing situation by either pilot."

The report slams Ryanair for not reporting the incident until 12 days afterwards. OK, this is not a happy story. But as we enter yet another peak travel season, could we at least look into better computer interfaces? The weather is getting worse now and the human-machine interface is prone to errors. We think more computers is a solution - machines that watch out for these types of events in the story above and simply take over for pilots who are not flying the plane are worth considering.

jetBlue slows deliveries again

Newswire item - JetBlue entered into Amendment No. 3 to our EMBRAER 190 Purchase Agreement to modify the timing of its EMBRAER 190 aircraft purchases.

Looks to me like there are 2 things at work here.
1) Can't find homes for the planes that quickly.
2) They still believe some carrier will disappear between now and 2016 and that will allow them to deploy aircraft into another hub.

Whatever the case, there appear to be fewer homes for the 100-seaters than they thought. And notice they also stress that there will be other aircraft sales and transactions during the period. Sound like a nice way of saying they are trying to not grow during the period. Nice conservative approach. Wonder how the Street will react. LCCs only make money when they can grow. Otherwise, the costs start creeping up.

Looks like maybe Neeleman is going to leave the problem of rationalizing their growth to the next CEO.

Could be a sign that since Embraer was willing to reaccommodate the timings that there are plenty of potential homes for 190s in other places.

Perhaps Southwest Airlines can teach us one thing in this regard. It is not adding the additional aircraft type itself that is the biggest issue. Sure maintenance and training and whatever are factors, but that is not the key. It could be that adding the additional aircraft type sometimes signals embarkation onto a different kind of mission and role for the airline that may not mesh with the airline's skills and strengths. Are these smaller, thinner markets not what jetBlue is supposed to be working on? Are they better, especially from a cost standpoint, at long haul high capacity routes.

It would be interesting to know how Austin and Richmond are doing. I can't see Austin doing that well for them, especially since they aren't flying AUS-SJC to complete the nerd-bird circuit.

Paris Tyler

Airbus and the Euro

The weakness of the dollar and strength of the Euro are exogenous factors beyond the control of either Airbus or Boeing. But clearly the situation heavily favors Boeing.

Rather than price in dollars, Airbus might consider pricing in Euros since its costs are Euro-based. This will not make its planes any cheaper. Creative financing is the only option for Airbus – while it needs to secure financing for product development, Airbus also needs to consider Euro-based sales financing.

Somehow Airbus must overcome the exchange rate impacts on its business. If it were to offer Euro-based leases for example, the exchange risk is passed on to its airline customers. Currently airlines leasing planes are subject to dollar fluctuations anyway, regardless of what they sell currency their tickets in. Perhaps this is a market opportunity for European banks? Airbus must break through this conundrum.

Delta/US Airways news - Hostile Takeover Attempt Gains Critical Audience

The likelihood of USAirways success appears to be increasing.

The merger of USAirways/America West is a fact. While certain implementation aspects are incomplete and problematic, the fact of the matter is that merger is not coming undone. Airline mergers are always contentions - remember Republic/Northwest and Piedmont/USAirways - but do get resolved, despite labor unions, seniority, pay rates, and service integration. In any merger in the airline industry, somebody's ox gets gored. Obviously, the reservation systems and baggage handing in PHL indicate that problems still exist for USAirways/America West, but the fact remains the carriers are not re-separating, and the issues are being addressed, albeit not as fast as everyone would like.

As for Delta, the decision belongs to those in control of the situation, Delta's creditors who will choose the best alternative for their interests. With a potential $1.6 billion in synergies identified for the merger, it will be difficult for Delta's management to create a more lucrative result for creditors. Will the creditors support USAirways, and 50 cents on the dollar, or Delta and 40 cents on the dollar. I know which way I'd vote. Boeing may be the swing creditor's vote - as they have a significant position at Delta, who are a key Boeing customer. If USAirways, a major Airbus customer, could assure Boeing a mixed fleet plan, who knows?

With respect to regulators, the selloff of one shuttle has American and Northwest interested in a bid. The elimination of duplicate routes and gates has already brought interest from Southwest, AirTran and JetBlue, all of whom would likely bid for gates and slots. From a regulatory standpoint, this merger is feasible - and the changes necessary have been identified and addressed.

It will all come down to economics. Can Delta come up with a better business plan as a stand alone operation? I doubt it. Delta has fallen from one of the best positioned legacy carriers a few years ago to one of the worst financially today. Why? Management, or lack thereof. Would you bet on an innovative management team from America West trying to build something different and better, and having repositioned and turned around its carrier to not only compete with Southwest, but grow in scope, or the team that brought Delta to its knees in bankruptcy. Smart investors bet on the most competent management team.

Ernie Arvai - The Arvai Group

Web bookings still a price game

Anyone involved with e-commerce can tell you that selling items online is driven by one fundamental issue - price. Assuming your website is reasonable looking and minimally credible, you will get all the sales if you have the lowest prices. As a test shop around for software.

Although retail price maintenance is illegal (as it should be), many suppliers refuse to supply online stores when they undercut "suggested prices". We have personal experience with this. When your supplier leaves you to hang out in the power? Absolutely not.

In the travel space resellers are in a great position. There is a happy confluence of two items - consumer greed and vendor aggression. Say you are selling travel and you have a vendor (a resort in Jamaica) who sets out prices you cannot deviate from. This cramps your style because you want to sell the beaches to the snowbirds in Canada and America for the peak season later this month. Rather than roll over and accept the deal, you can offer other resorts in Jamaica. Better yet, sell the regions other resorts - Costa Rica for example. If people are going to fly five hours, another hour is no biggie for a bargain.

You see Gordon Gekko was right, greed is good. Online travel sales are all about segmentation and the biggest segment is the one driven by price. The secret is to exploit the inherent greed of suppliers and consumers. ------------
Brand is the least important differentiating factor between travel web sites, according to new research from PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Its November edition of its Hospitality Directions Europe white paper ‘How to maintain success in the online travel space’ says that online players are facing a double squeeze - competition within the sector itself and the increasing strength of suppliers.

The paper pulls together research from organisations such as TripVision, PhoCusWright and the IPS but also introduces some new in-house findings. In June, PWC asked 200 people ‘what drives you to use one [online travel] agency instead of another?’

Allowing for multiple responses, the results showed that price was the most mentioned by 85%, brand by only 30%.

Web 2.0 activists may also be as alarmed as marketing departments by the findings - user generated content has not yet become a differentiating factor and is less important than generic hotel/destination information to the PWC sample.

Easy booking, easy navigation and a good range of destinations follow price as the factors which prompt customers to chose one OTA over another.

Malcolm Preston, UK travel sector leader and co-author of the report, said that online agents needed to focus on their hotel content in order to differentiate. He suggested that OTAs who become destination specialists were at an advantage – ‘not necessarily more hotels but different hotels’.

He added that OTAs which adopted a supplier-friendly approach to its negotiations with hoteliers would be at an advantage. ‘OTAs than can work with hoteliers on yield and occupancy can get exclusive inventory or a better rate,’ he suggested.

You can download a copy of the paper here.

Iberia ponders $4bn Boeing plane bid

Iberia is considering placing a $4 billion order for Boeing 787s. This could break a recent tradition of exclusive Airbuspurchases, Spanish newspaper El Economista reports Monday, citing unnamed senior managers at Spain's national airline.

Iberia officials are looking to buy around 25 new planes to renew their long-haul fleet and have been impressed with the market reception of the Boeing 787, while concerned with a series of production problems Airbus has had for its new models, according to El Economista.

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Crazy KC135 fly by

Watch this to see a crazy low fly by. If you have more, we will publish them - please email them to info@iag-inc.com

This matches other low flybys we have found.

Dummy of the week #48 - Hartsfield Atlanta Airport

Airports, you would hope, have a handle on who works within their premises. Not so. Read this story.

Friday, December 01, 2006

Its official at last! - A350 XWB FAMILY RECEIVES INDUSTRIAL GO-AHEAD

This is the official PR piece just in.
-----------
Airbus was given the go-ahead for the industrial launch of the A350 XWB Family, a new medium capacity long-range extra wide-body Family from the Board of Directors of its parent company EADS. The decision is based on strong market demand and customer backing. Entry into service of the first A350 XWB is planned for 2013.

Conceived from the outset to become a comprehensive airliner Family, the A350 XWB will be available in three basic passenger versions, the A350-800 which can fly 270 passengers in a spacious three-class configuration up to 8,500nm / 15,750 km, the A350-900 seating 314, and the A350-1000 which is designed for 350, both with ranges of up to 8,300nm / 15,400 km. The three passenger versions have a cruise speed of Mach 0.85. As an ultra long-range aircraft, the A350-900R will fly even further. A freighter version, the A350-900F will complement the passenger models. According to its latest Global Market Forecast, Airbus estimates the demand for passenger and freighter aircraft in this category, for the next 20 years, at some 5,700 planes representing 41 per cent in terms of value of all new aircraft delivered above 100 seats.

“The A350 XWB has it all to become a great success - the most advanced technologies, the best economics and the highest level of comfort. It is a direct response to market demand,” says Louis Gallois, Airbus President and CEO, and co-CEO of EADS. “The decision follows a thorough review of all the resources available to ensure a smooth development of the Family backed by a very sound programme planning. Airbus remains a lead player in providing a complete range of modern airliners to its customers.”

With a cross section of 232 inches / 5.9 meters, the A350 XWB will benefit from the widest fuselage in its category, offering unprecedented levels of comfort in this market segment. It will also offer the lowest operating costs and lowest seat mile cost of any aircraft in that category. The Family is designed to confront the challenges of high fuel prices, rising passenger expectations, and environmental concerns in that market segment.

The A350 XWB will be powered by new generation Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engines delivering between 75,000 and 95,000lbs of thrust. Rolls Royce CEO, Sir John Rose, said: “We are very pleased to join Airbus for its A350 XWB programme. Together, we are committed to set new standards in fuel-efficiency, maintainability and engine reliability for the 21st century.”

To achieve this, the new A350 XWB will feature the latest innovations in terms of advanced technologies. Amongst those is the use of all-new, easy to maintain and much lighter Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) paneled fuselage skins. This innovation in manufacturing permits easier maintainability and reparability of individual airframe parts, while also allowing the structure of the panels to be much better optimized in terms of design to the stress and load requirements of each individual airframe part. Over 60 per cent of the airframe will be made of new materials.

Moreover, the fly-by-wire A350 XWB will have handling and flight deck operational commonality allowing airlines to benefit from the Airbus family concept of cross crew qualification and mixed fleet flying.

Kingfisher Airlines news - blame the LCCs

A report from India speaks of erstwhile airline mogul and beer king, Vijay Mallya, blamed undercutting by low-cost carriers for his airline's loss.

Losses among India's airlines should not be a big source of concern. This happens everywhere when the airline sector is opened up to competition. Some airlines will go under while those with resources (non airline revenue sources like breweries) survive. So help the man - next time you buy a six pack, please make it Kingfisher. Other airlines in India wish they had a revenue source to help them through the first frantic growth phase.

Remember Varig?

Once upon a time there was an airline called Varig. No its not coming back, despite its generally lovely cabin crew. Reuters reports Brazilian airline Varig, which recently escaped bankruptcy, will buy 16 planes as soon as it is allowed to resume operations and will change its name to Nordeste, a senior executive said on Thursday.

There is talk of a fleet of 45 by the end of 2006 - yes, that is 31 days away. Currently the airline has 15 planes and just over 10% market share. We'll believe it when we see it.

France urges Airbus to build A350

After two years of tinkering (more political than technical we think), Airbus is no closer to taking on Boeing in what is emerging as the sweetest spot in the market. Airbus has a group of amazingly loyal customers. No A350 customers have defected and Airbus has even been able to add customers that already ordered the 787 (Singapore).

*"The A350 is the core of the market," (French industry minister) Loos said. "France would welcome favorably a decision by the board" of EADS to proceed with the plane, Loos told lawmakers Wednesday in Paris. "To make the plane, we need the board to decide on it, and then we need to work with the other countries in EADS, the other countries in Airbus, to find means of support for this big project," he said.

With support like this you would expect EADS to jump into the market - but it has not. Clearly there continues to be faction fighting within EADS that ties Airbus in knots. This is an irrational way to run a business with long lead times and complex projects. How can Airbus get out from under EADS?
-------
*BLOOMBERG NEWS -- France would like to see Airbus move ahead with developing the A350 to take on The Boeing Co. and is willing to discuss potential assistance from the government, said Francois Loos, the country's industry minister.