Monday, June 30, 2008

Today's news

Meet the Blackswift - an SR71 replacement. Because this plane will fly at Mach 6 quite a few things will change. For a start it looks like it will be pilotless. It is powered by a pulse engine -like the one on the German V-1 from WW2. The pulse engine is a scramjet which pulses at something like 1,000 per second. This next chart explains why the pulse engine is needed to achieve such high speeds.

Take a look here for more on this amazing engine concept. Below you see a picture of the P&W scramjet engine being tested in a wind tunnel.

Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne have successfully tested a sub-scale combustor for a dual-mode ramjet engine. With the Dual-mode, the engine can function both at subsonic speeds and then speed up to supersonic scramjet speeds (greater than Mach 5).

Here is a somewhat dramatic video of what this amazing technology is about.

Essentially what this means, is flying up to 10,000 miles in less than two hours. Of course one cannot imagine a commercial application of this technology - though the thought of London-Sydney in two hours seems attractive given the state of air travel; even with the A380 and that double bed.

In other news --

  • GTF vs. Open Rotor
  • China raises fuel surcharge 50% - but its still only $12
  • SAS' challenging times - no kidding
  • Singapore gets A380 #5 - and a new 777-300ER to boot

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Friday, June 27, 2008

    Today's news

    GAO Tanker analysis -- A number of you have been following the tanker mess and we recommend this as good reading. It has some zingers -

  • The Air Force failed “to evaluate proposals in accordance with the [request for proposals (RFP)] criteria and requirements and to conduct discussion in a fair and equal manner”
  • GAO sustained many of Boeing’s protest points
  • the Air Force unfairly awarded extra credit to Northrop Grumman in the area of aerial refueling capability, which was measured by a calculation of the fuel offload of both aircraft versus the unrefueled radius range objective in the RFP

    This report leaves the Air Force procurement process looking inept at best, and crooked at worst. Why would the procurement process have been so flawed? As Scott Hamilton has pointed out, they had a shadow team watching over their shoulder. What happened with this shadow team? The process was long winded too - surely they had time to go over every item a few times. An astute observer like Loren Thompson seemingly switched sides in the process also. With each drip of news people outside this debacle find grist for a conspiracy mill.

    See more analysis here and here. Richard Aboulafia is scathing in his assessment also - in commenting on how the Air Force undertook its analysis; "It indicates deliberate favoritism for the Northrop/EADS bid." Richard goes on to point out that even if the Air Force rebid openly gives points for a "bigger" solution and Boeing responds with the 777, it might not win because that plan is too big.

    Which brings us back to the question we have asked many times. Why did Boeing focus on the smallest 767? Why did it not utilize the bigger and clearly more versatile -300 or even -400? If Boeing's response is still going to be that the RFP called for a "size" then it would seem Boeing was less prepared to offer more than what the Pentagon was asking for. But the Pentagon often ends up buying something offers more, doesn't it? It certainly is rational - every consumer ends up selecting the most for the money. So in all this dragging out of dirty laundry let it not be forgotten that Boeing may simply not have played its best card in the RFP response. If there is a rebid, Boeing may have to simply offer something bigger.

    In other news --

  • Farecompare analysis
  • JFK ATC irritation
  • Hello FlyDubai - Emirates MIA?
  • Cargo airline nailed - again

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Thursday, June 26, 2008

    Today's news

    Virgin here, Virgin there, Virgin everywhere -- Richard Branson is in talks with Brazilian partners to start an airline in Latin America's largest country, the Agencia Estado news service reports. The airline would be a kind of "Virgin Brazil" and would start out with domestic flights, although it may later expand with international destinations, Branson said on the outskirts of the Global Humanitarian Forum in Geneva, according to Agencia Estado. "Brazil is a very dynamic market and we haven't paid enough attention to it in the past," said Branson, who controls Virgin Atlantic Airways. "We know there is a lot of room to grow given the country's size and the need to develop the air transportation system for Brazil's own growth." Branson said the talks are ongoing and he expects an announcement soon, Agencia Estado said.

    Brazil's civil aviation laws cap foreign ownership of domestic airlines at 20%. Moreover, Branson would face competition from large rivals TAM Linhas Aereas and Gol Linhas Aereas, which command ~90% of Brazil's domestic aviation market. In addition, JetBlue Airways' founder David Neeleman has announced plans to launch a Brazilian airline early in 2009 - his plans are firm and include orders, a website and a real business. Since Neeleman is Brazilian, he faces none of the limits Branson faces. In addition, given the mercurial nature of Brazil's aviation market, SRB runs an unusually high risk of stubbing his toe. On the other hand, he overcame similar problems in Nigeria.

    With the Brazilian economy booming and air travel growing at a double-digit pace annually, he's betting there is plenty of room for new players in a market where travelers have few options.

    In other news --

  • A chill descends on Asia - and bank of China in the wings
  • Single Euro Sky legislation - huh?
  • Alitalia-AirOne - is this for real?
  • More bad news from Africa - Nigeria's mafia
  • Ancillary revenues for airlines & GDS'

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Wednesday, June 25, 2008

    Today's news

    Fuel prices impact China -- ATW has a good piece on this today. Essentially the Chinese government is raising fuel costs by 25% and the airlines want to raise short haul fares by 33% and long haul fares by 50%.

    Some interesting items to think about here.

  • First the government needs to get out of the pricing business. Because they have been subsidizing fuel costs and thereby encouraging fuel inefficiency. Now its true communists don't care for economics, but by now even China must realize that markets work better than any apparatchik.
  • Second, once the fuel prices start to reflect reality, airlines need to sharply raise fares - but in a communist country this requires "approval". Every day of delay in this causes the airlines lots of hurt - not a good thing when these are public companies. Suddenly the boom times in China are overshadowed by the fact that investors might not have thought enough about investing in a nominally communist economy. The state may feel compelled to wait on fare hikes as they are rattled by a series of inept moves since the earthquake. Perhaps they would rather be seen to sting the nearly capitalist airlines and benefit the consumer.
  • Third, as the fares are held down for too long the airlines hurt big time. Foreign investors bail out of airline stocks causing an obvious price decline. China's domestic investors follow suit. The strong yuan eases the price shocks of oil, but cannot stem the tide of shifting expectations. The nature of central planning falls on its face (again), unable to react quickly enough to market forces. The Chinese economy starts to wobble because air transport has become such a big part of their growth. All in time for the Olympics.

    This could not happen to nicer bunch of people.

    In other news --

  • ALAFCO's deal with Saudia - talk about paying retail
  • Counter intuitive Niki
  • ATA defends its members
  • Willie Walsh takes a go at Heathrow - this time its really good
  • How the US airline shrink affects you; yes you

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Tuesday, June 24, 2008

    Today's news

    United slims down -- What is the news if not another shrink? Here's today big shrink news - The latest layoffs involve nearly 15% of United's 6,518 pilots. The carrier has said it plans to cut its staff by 1,400 to 1,600 as it aims to reduce domestic capacity by 14% in the fourth quarter.

    So, as the airline "slims down" how will it ever grow again? With each layoff, and each plane that gets parked, three US airlines are almost certainly going to grow; Southwest, AirTran and jetBlue. Provided their money holds out, perhaps Virgin will also grow.

    United is clearly going to hold on to its overseas routes. But with ever more limited feed opportunities, how will these work? Can United sustain with only limited feed and local O&D? For example the Dulles operation depends a lot on feed. As does Chicago. Same for SFO. The picture looks gloomy.

    In other news --

  • Service vacuum will be mostly filled
  • Tanker - rebid and flyoff
  • Tom Enders worries about Airbus' reputation
  • This is Etihad's year
  • How it used to be - PanAm 1958

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Monday, June 23, 2008

    Today's news

    25% of orders at risk -- These chilling words are what many of us have been waiting for. Read more here. Those blockbuster orders we have seen over the past two years seemed too good to be true.

    Of course the open question remains; who gets hurt the most from these high risk orders? The story talks about Spicejet and Lion - both Boeing buyers. The Airbus buyers are just as risky; and there are more of them. The biggest risks seem to be among those airlines buying the single aisle planes.

    Note that the huge orders for these smaller jets has allowed Airbus and Boeing to slide their replacements closer to 2020. A collapse in deliveries because of canceled orders might be the spur to accelerate RS plans. Behind every cloud, as they say.

    In other news --

  • Your new smart phone - yes, you actually do need one
  • Airlines shrink - again and again
  • Midwest parks MD80s
  • Kevin Mitchell is more depressed than we are
  • In the midst of the crisis - Nigeria is worse off than we are

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Friday, June 20, 2008

    Today's news

    A thought on US airline mergers -- A purely selfish thought. In the event that you must fly one of the US legacies, and want to avoid the crush at the gates, take another look at getting yourself an Amex platinum card. The card is not cheap at some $380 per year, but consider this.

    If there are going to be three alliances, it seems this card will get you into all the clubs. American accepts it in lieu of an Admiral's membership. It has always been accepted by Delta. It works also at Northwest and Continental. Therefore it would seem to us this one card will shortly be opening all club doors, even United will end up accepting it because of Continental.

    All of a sudden that annual fee looks rather like a great deal, does it not?

    In other news --

  • The carbon offset racket
  • Sue Payton to be sacrificed?
  • The aftermath of UA/CO
  • Alitalia/AirOne

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Thursday, June 19, 2008

    Today's news

    ATA's testimony -- The Air Transport Association of America testified before the Senate Committee on Agriculture Nutrition and Forestry and Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government on the crisis facing the airline industry resulting from record-high jet fuel prices.

    ATA called on Congress to act now to impose common-sense measures to ensure transparency and reel back the overwhelming odds now favoring index speculators and institutional investors, particularly those trading on foreign exchanges. “The impact of these unprecedented jet fuel prices on the airlines is devastating and airlines may see 2008 losses nearing $10bn, on par with the worst financial year in aviation history,” ATA President and CEO James C. May said. “This year, airlines will spend more than $61bn on fuel, slightly more than the total fuel bill combined for the first four years of this decade.”

    May explained the inextricable link between the nation’s economy and the air transportation system and noted that if airlines continue to spiral downward, so too will the nation’s economy. Already more than 14,000 airline jobs have been eliminated and 100 communities have lost scheduled air service, with more job losses and service cuts inevitable. If oil prices continue their upward path, potentially 200 communities could lose all scheduled air service.

    May stressed to Congress the importance of urgent, critical oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission over the energy commodity futures market to curtail excessive oil speculation.

    “Leading economic and commodities experts around the world believe crude oil prices today are unnecessarily high and distorted due, in large part, to market manipulation and excessive speculation,” said May. “We are asking for Congress to take steps now – not 60 to 90 days from now – to totally close the loopholes and make the market more transparent and balanced, to ensure a level playing field for all.” May concluded, “If Congress does not act soon, this country will not have a viable airline industry.”

    Of course the unmentioned issue here is that most of the oil trades are taking place in London - well outside Congress' grasp. The UK traders and markets find this process invasive and don't care for it at all. Now were Congress to stop the spending binges like the Farm Bill and enact policies that strengthen the value of the US dollar, we would likely see an immediate change in direction of the price of oil.

    But since we are headed into an election, the Democrats want the economy as weak as they can make it. They can then blame the Republicans and help Obama win in November. Its a cynical view; we think this holds water. Nero fiddled while Rome burned - its a well established process. And the "game" does not endear the nation's politicians to the electorate. Its a pity more people in the national media don't see it this way. Thousands of people's lives are literally being toyed with.

    In other news --

  • Another EADS name comes up
  • GAO tanker bomb - the foolishness continues
  • Ryanair attacks EU - again
  • BA quits US stock markets
  • Frontier in terminal phase?

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Wednesday, June 18, 2008

    Today's news

    Another UFO story -- There has to be something to this...there is a never ending source of activity and these days increasingly there are images that would seem to make the most ardent non-believer suspicious. Here's the latest one that makes us wonder what is going on? Its not even close to April 1st.

    In other news --

  • e-Check in grows
  • A380 novelty power is strong
  • Virgin America cuts back
  • Lufthansa's environmental report
  • Airbus sees strong German demand

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Tuesday, June 17, 2008

    Today's news

    The failing Dhruv -- India as you well know is a nation with huge aviation ambitions. It is only eclipsed by China in this regard. Therefore news of its locally made helicopter's failings are something to watch.

    The Indian Navy announced it would not purchase anymore locally made Dhruv helicopters. The navy bought six of the Dhruvs for evaluation, and did not like what they found. The main complaints are a lack of engine power and poor reliability. Not a good thing for helicopters meant for Navy search and rescue and anti-submarine warfare.

    The Dhruv has been in development for twenty years. So there is clearly some hubris here. The military can only be expected to be patient so long. India's Arjun tank has had a similar long gestation period - so India's military procurement is a sensitive matter.

    Therefore, consider what may be the most important feature that country will be looking for in its fighter deal. We would bet its going to be local training and development. This does not favor the Americans or the Russians who want to keep their best ideas at home. It also is not something the Typhoon and French teams can accommodate too much for the same reasons. Advantage Gripen.

    In other news --

  • China and Taiwan create direct air links
  • Watch the collateral
  • A cold shower from ATA's John Heimlich - the travel industry needs this news
  • Another sign of the times - AirAsia gets government travel contracts

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Sunday, June 15, 2008

    Today's News

    This news hot off the web - we think it quite amusing to read this part "At a time of soaring oil prices, the A380 is considered a good investment by airlines because its size allows for more passengers per flight." How trite is that remark after having told us the plane carries 450? After all it was originally touted as a 550 seater.

    If the statement were true, wouldn't we be seeing a flood of A380 orders? Oh well. The correspondent does not have a clue.

    In other news --

  • Las Vegas cuts - reflects on the cutters
  • China route case news
  • More Heathrow news - no, of course its not good

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Friday, June 13, 2008

    Today's News

    Please take a look at this link. For those of you interested in your airline or GDS to make a little ancillary revenue, we have a plan you might want to consider.

    Although the announcement does not make this statement (they forgot it) - here's the deal. We will be able to pay a data source like an airline or a booking system $1 per completed survey. Our budget is small at this stage but we hope to expand it.

    The proposition is this - the travel industry needs this data to get a handle on the international travel market into and out of the US. This data source is the richest source of insight. By getting paper surveys off planes and out of airports, we cut costs for the industry, speed up reporting and provide a lot more data for the money. This is a win-win for everyone that needs this data and who could use the funding.

    If you have questions please contact us.

    In other news --

  • ATA cries uncle
  • Tanker update
  • US Airways cuts
  • Rockwell Collins demo

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Thursday, June 12, 2008

    Today's News

    An industry first for the US - Low-cost airline Virgin America on Wednesday announced fuel surcharges in all of its markets, effective immediately, in response to the unprecedented rise in oil prices. The surcharges include $25 on long-haul routes such as San Francisco to New York, and $10 on short-haul flights such as San Francisco to Los Angeles.

    This is actually a great idea. The last price hike faltered because Continental started rolling back fares. Then American started another $20 wave, but Delta didn't match. Subsequently Continental and United did match.

    The constant fare hikes and the follow on dancing is driving people nuts. A fare more effective solution is the fuel surcharge. Put it on the table and then we're done with it. Virgin's move is not only a good one - its a brave move for a small player to undertake. This is a leadership move that may get all sorts of reaction. If Southwest matches this move, the industry will follow. Here's hoping they do. The surcharge is easier to follow than the murky fare changes so loved by the legacies. Its plain that the industry has not been able to fully cover the fuel cost increases by taking the murky path. Once again we see that it takes an LCC to cut the Gordian knot.

    Will this garner Virgin some respect? Let's hope so.

    In other news --

  • C-130 tests TP400 engine
  • 787 power on - at last
  • EADS and its stakeholders
  • Beware what you ask for...
  • 777 demand

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Wednesday, June 11, 2008

    Today's news

    You often hear stories about how the Internet has created a powerful tool, that if used correctly, can assault a service or product provider with a smack heard around the world. Today, be prepared for another example - read this.

    Do go through the comments as it shows Delta knows about his situation. But clearly the damage is done and Delta looks immensely stupid - more stupid than any government; like TSA for example. Now imagine how such an experience will be under a newer, bigger Delta - you think they will be better, with more feeling?

    Don't bet on it. Welcome to air travel like its going to be. You've heard of self loading freight? One clear option is to consider not flying a US airline unless you really have to. If that option is available. Judging by how things are shaping up, this choice may become easier as foreign airlines reach deeper into the US. For US domestic flights though; LCCs are looking better every day.

    In other news --

  • Milan gets respect
  • Broadband in-flight revenues to reach $1bn
  • Mesa gets more bad news
  • LiveTV buys ground station network

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Friday, June 06, 2008

    Today's news

    Mindful no doubt of the stock analyst's prediction in the UK that Silverjet was headed for extinction which turned out to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, airline CEOs are wary of how they are reported on by analysts. No wonder then that Virgin Blue's CEO in Australia reacted vociferously to the JP Morgan Australia report that suggested the airline is in trouble.

    Geoffrey Thomas at ATW interviewed the CEO yesterday and has this rather more upbeat assessment. But of course ATW is not read by the majority of people following the industry in Australia. Far more are likely to read this story or perhaps this one. The overall story is how Australia's airlines need to react to the oil shock. But the JP Morgan part of the story implies that Virgin Blue is in trouble.

    These days that seems to be all that is required to make people switch their business for fear of getting stuck with a worthless ticket and no travel options. The implications are likely unfounded, but the damage is done. Virgin Blue will now have to spend money reassuring the public that its not in trouble. Raising fares these days is not hard to do. But in doing so the JP Morgan analysts will appear vindicated. No matter what they do, Virgin Blue looks dumb. And there really is no need for this but that's the impact of a poor story.

    In other news --

  • Sarkozy sells Rafales - well kind of
  • BetaBlue update - 500 planes now using LiveTV
  • USAF staff bombshell
  • Passenger data back in the news
  • The Silverjet phoenix - now with Swiss money
  • Dornier-228 comeback
  • Is the SJ-30 saved?

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Thursday, June 05, 2008

    Today's news

    Headcount shrinkage accelerates -- The layoff news is growing. Mergers won't save jobs despite what you hear from the CEOs. The idea behind a merger is to save money - so once merged the first order of business is cutting. To believe anything else is naive.

    But there is another side to this - people are leaving the industry at the slightest excuse. Delta offered buy-outs to 3,000 people in the hope that 2,000 would accept. Guess what? All 3,000 took the deal. So now Delta says some may be hired back. To think that the person running this buy out was not shown the door is amazing. What nobody talks about is what such deals do within the company. The fear of being unemployed in this economy; the endless discussion in the offices, the time wasted and the meetings. By the way, its not just in the airline business. GM reported that a quarter of its union workers had accepted buyout offers.

    There can be no doubt that Delta's staff productivity took a dive during this and, from what we hear, is still lower now. It's not like these people were just sitting around. Earlier layoffs had forced many people to do more than one person's work. Imagine what it will look like next year.

    Meanwhile in Houston, Continental employees got this note yesterday:

    Dear Co-worker:
    We've always said that you deserve open, honest and direct communication. This letter and the attached employee bulletin and Q&A are part of that commitment.
    The airline industry is in a crisis. Its business model doesn't work with the current price of fuel and the existing level of capacity in the marketplace. We need to make changes in response.
    While there have been several successful fare increases, those increases haven't been sufficient to cover the rising cost of fuel. As fares increase, fewer customers will fly. As fewer customers fly, we will need to reduce our capacity to match the reduced demand. As we reduce our capacity, we will need fewer employees to operate the airline. Although these changes will be painful, we must adapt to the reality of today's market to successfully navigate these difficult times.
    The attached employee bulletin and Q&A outline some of the steps we are taking to address this industry crisis. The situation for all airlines is serious, and the actions we are announcing today are necessary to secure our future. We regret the loss of jobs caused by this crisis, and we will do our best to minimize furloughs and involuntary terminations.
    These actions will help Continental survive this crisis. You have our ongoing commitment to keep you informed as the industry evolves and adapts to these unprecedented challenges. It is important that we all keep our focus on working together during these difficult times.
    Co-worker Impact
    As a result of the capacity reductions, Continental will need fewer co-workers worldwide to support the reduced flight schedule. About 3,000 positions, including management positions, will be eliminated through voluntary and involuntary separations, with the majority expected to be through voluntary programmes.
    Network Changes
    Starting in September, at the conclusion of the peak summer season, Continental will reduce its flights, with fourth quarter domestic mainline departures to be down 16 percent year-over-year. This will result in a reduction of domestic mainline capacity (available seat miles, or ASMs) by 11 percent in the fourth quarter, compared to the same period last year.
    By the end of next week, Continental will provide details on specific flights and destinations that are subject to reduction or elimination. For additional information on departures and capacity for 2008 and 2009.
    Continental says it plans to cut 3,000 jobs, reduce domestic departures by 16% beginning in September and cut the size of its fleet.

    In other news --

  • Qantas gets excited - A380 gets ready for delivery
  • The end of growth - WestJet load factor stumbles
  • The 717 lives!
  • BAE corruption update - another subpoena
  • Its really bad - our simple model shows everyone is in the red-deep red

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Wednesday, June 04, 2008

    Today's news

    The Hurt Grows -- The news from Florida is filling people in the commercial aviation industry with trepidation. Laying off as much as 60% of its flight attendants and 45% of its pilots is devastating.

    Clearly the United news adds to this fear. But the general scenario is one of great pain to come for airline employees. How much longer before this becomes political? Airline Business's America's Editor David Field predicted this months ago.

    The awful news is not only in the USA - "High fuel prices will trigger a rash of aviation bankruptcies, leaving only five major airlines in Europe" an official from easyJet claims. “Several airlines in Europe will go out of business,” John Kohlsaat, head of the German unit of easyJet, said in an interview published yesterday in Berlin’s daily Der Tagesspiegel.

    In other news --

  • United announces fleet cuts
  • BA looks at widebody order
  • A winner in the midst of the mess - Airline Partners Boeing and its winglets
  • Another winner - anyone making composites

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Tuesday, June 03, 2008

    Today's news

    Soros on oil -- Today's FT has a good story on the views of George Soros and the oil bubble. His views echo those of an oil trader we spoke with, but are contrary to those of The Economist.

    What is interesting here is that the paper and the oil are out of whack. Whereas the actual amount of oil available has changed little this year (there has been no shortage) the amount of paper chasing the oil has increased amazingly. There has been some sort of disconnect. Soros talks of institutional buying driving up the prices. Being something of a speculator, he should know. The Economist is also correct when it lays out the fundamentals - oil is perverse. When its price is low, nobody invests in finding new sources. When its price is high, everyone is looking for more.

    We are not sure if there is a bubble in the market or not. We don't know who to blame for the high prices - does one need to blame anybody at all? The bottom line is that we need to wean ourselves from this product and fast. The tragedy seems to be that nothing was learned from the last oil shock. We are as dependent on this stuff as ever. One would have thought that after 30 years western economies would have developed new energy sources to remove the diabolical power the oil producers have in holding western economies for ransom.

    If there's blame to throw around, we'd start there. Oil producing nations are, by and large, not seen as paragons of democracy and development. Most of the oil is found under the sand of crooked states. How is it that we got into this mess - again? Politicians seeking scapegoats might start by looking around their offices first.

    In other news --

  • IATA AGM - Spinetta wants a new plane
  • Continental's numbers - guidance or not?
  • Ryanair's profits
  • More crowd thinning - United's expected cuts will be brutal
  • Eating their own - US Airways pilots make their fight public

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  • Monday, June 02, 2008

    Today's news

    Are the banks smelling a deal? Just a few weeks ago Ferrovial, the owners of BAA, were scrambling to refinance their massive debt. The mortgage loan debacle was scaring banks and money was tight. There was a flutter of concern - what if BAA could not get those loans sorted out?

    Well here we are; Ferrovial said today that nine banks have agreed to the basic terms of a £7.65bn ($15.1bn) loan which is part of a debt refinancing at its BAA airports subsidiary. Earlier, Expansion newspaper reported eight banks would sign a £7.5bn syndicated loan.

    How come there has been this sudden shift? Perhaps the risk have changed - a lot. It seem likely that BAA's monopoly will be broken. Ferrovial may have to sell Gatwick and maybe even Stansted. Therefore the amount of capital that will flood into the London airport system makes things not so dicey. Lending to Ferrovial now looks like a better bet - its loans can be paid off with the asset sales. Meanwhile the banks stepping up now make huge loan fees which Ferrovial has to eat because its in a tight spot. Ferrovial knows that it can pay off the loans if and when asset sales are made. But it is unlikely to recover those loan fees.

    Of course if the monopoly is not broken, those banks are going to be sitting on some risk they did not expect. It seems the banks are betting on a break up of the monopoly.

    In other news --

  • A B2 replacement in the works?
  • Hubris or new habits - thoughts on Ryanair's May numbers
  • Remember Airbus' drip-drip-drip? Now its Boeing's turn
  • Pockets of strength - Paul Getty's buying guidance

    Subscribe to analysis and opinion behind these headlines at Blackprogram

  •